What is the relationship between ds vector and theta in flux integrals?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding the relationship between the differential area vector \( \vec{ds} \) and the angle \( \theta \) in the context of flux integrals. Participants are exploring how to express \( \vec{ds} \) in terms of \( \theta \) while considering the implications of the magnetic flux through a surface.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to clarify the definition and direction of \( \vec{ds} \) and its relationship to the angle \( \theta \). There are discussions about deriving the components of \( \vec{ds} \) and whether the angle in question is indeed \( \theta \) or \( 90^\circ - \theta \). Some participants are also questioning the implications of induced current in relation to changing magnetic flux.

Discussion Status

There is ongoing exploration of the components of \( \vec{ds} \) and the correct interpretation of angles involved. Some participants have provided guidance on using trigonometric identities to simplify expressions, while others are questioning the assumptions regarding the direction of induced current in relation to magnetic fields.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating through parts of the problem that involve assumptions about angles and the nature of magnetic flux, indicating potential gaps in information or understanding that are being actively discussed.

Marcin H
Messages
306
Reaction score
6

Homework Statement


Screen Shot 2017-10-07 at 2.49.31 PM.png

Part b and e.

Homework Equations


Flux = surface integral of B (dot) ds

The Attempt at a Solution


I just want to make sure that I have a good understanding of ds. ds is just the direction of the vector that is normal to our area that we are finding our flux throuhg correct? so that is why in part A we just take B*A in the -z(hat) direction because that is the direction of our ds vector. But for part b we have to find our flux in terms of the angle theta and I am stuck with how to find ds. what I have written down at the bottom there for ds is what the what it should be supposedly, but I can't see where it came from and I am struggling to derive it. How do I get ds here in terms of theta?
New Doc 2017-10-07.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
upload_2017-10-7_15-25-1.png

After correcting for the mistake shown above, can you find the y and z components of ##\vec{ds}##?
 
TSny said:
View attachment 212541
After correcting for the mistake shown above, can you find the y and z components of ##\vec{ds}##?
I had a feeling that angle wasn't theta. I am not too sure how to fix that drawing there to solve for ds. if that angle is not theta, what is it?

Edit* is it 90˚ - theta?
 
Marcin H said:
is it 90˚ - theta?
Yes.
 
TSny said:
Yes.
so to find the 2 components of ds do we just use cos and sin?

drawisland (1).png


==> ds_y = -ds*cos(90-theta)
==> ds_z = -ds*sin(90-theta)

===> ds = -ds[cos(90-theta)+sin(90-theta)]

What about the 90˚ part? how do we get rid of that?
 
TSny said:
ohhhhhhhh ok got it. That was tricky. Thanks!

I also was a bit confused by part D and E. So we have a initial flux from the surrounding Bfield going through the surface. That flux will induce a current in the wire. Now the question is which direction is it. I thought that the current should go in the direction that will produce an b field that goes against the initial B field. So by that the induced current would be clockwise. But I don't think that is correct and I am not sure why.
 
Marcin H said:
So we have a initial flux from the surrounding Bfield going through the surface. That flux will induce a current in the wire.
It's not the flux that induces a current, it's the changing flux that induces a current.

Now the question is which direction is it. I thought that the current should go in the direction that will produce an b field that goes against the initial B field.
The B field produced by the induced current does not necessarily point "against" the initial field.

The induced field creates a flux through the loop that opposes the change in initial flux. Another way to say it is that the induced flux is in a direction such as to try to keep the flux constant. Thus if the initial flux increases, the induced flux will be in the opposite direction of the initial flux. But if the initial flux decreases, the induced flux will be in the same direction as the initial flux.
 

Similar threads

Replies
46
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K