What is the relationship between electric potential and work done?

AI Thread Summary
Electric potential is defined as the work done per unit charge to move a test charge from infinity to a specific point. The equation for electric potential is EP = k*(Q/R), where k is a constant, Q is the charge, and R is the distance from the charge. The discussion involves deriving the relationship between electric potential and work done, with attempts to express work done in terms of electric potential and distance. The integral of force from infinity to a distance R is used to calculate the work done, highlighting the connection between electric potential and the work required to move a charge. Understanding this relationship is essential for grasping concepts in electrostatics.
ojsimon
Messages
56
Reaction score
0
Hi

I am sure this is very basic but i am struggling to derive or work this out, and i have looked, on the internet and textbooks and can't find this.

The electric potential at a point is defined as the work done per unit charge to move a small test charge from infinity to that point.

And an equation for it is : EP = k*(Q/R)

I want to get back to the definition from this equation, but i can't get very far:

here is what i have done: WD= work done

Q/R = (wd/v)/R
= wd/vR


But i can't go much further without it just going back to the original form... Can anyone help me?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi ojsimon! :smile:

(what's v ? :confused:)

work done = ∫ force d(distance) = ∫R kQ/r2 dr :wink:

(and d(work done)/dr = force)
 
sorry v was meant to be voltage and came from the equation v=wd/q

Thanks although i don't quite understand your integral?

Thanks
 
ojsimon said:
Thanks although i don't quite understand your integral?

The integral is the force integrated from infinity to the distance R, since the PE is the work done to get the charge from infinity to R.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top