What is the Relationship Between Perimeter and Area in an Infinite Staircase?

  • Thread starter Thread starter macbowes
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Area Relation
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the relationship between perimeter and area in the context of an infinite staircase, questioning whether it is possible to maintain the same perimeter while infinitely reducing the area. It highlights that while infinitely creating corners can approximate a perfect curve, the resulting shape remains jagged, leading to a discrepancy between the values of 4 and pi. The conversation references the behavior of regular polygons, noting that their perimeter remains constant at 4 while their area approaches that of a circle. Additionally, it compares the staircase problem to the convergence of stairsteps to a straight line, emphasizing that the total length remains 2, not the straight line's length of √2. The conclusion drawn is that the stairsteps do indeed converge uniformly to the line.
macbowes
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Alright, so I was just browsing 4Chan and I came across this post.

[PLAIN]http://img121.imageshack.us/img121/5374/1291537737867.jpg

I realize infinitely making corners out of corners may result in an approximation of a perfect curve, however, it will always be jagged and thus result in the difference between 4 and pi.

My question is, can you maintain the same perimeter while infinitely reducing the area? Cause that's what it appears to be doing in the picture.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=450364

macbowes said:
I realize infinitely making corners out of corners may result in an approximation of a perfect curve, however, it will always be jagged and thus result in the difference between 4 and pi.

Approximations by regular polygons will also always be jagged, but the limit is pi.
 
The perimeter will polygon will always equal 4. The area, of the polygon, however, will come infinitely close to the area of the circle. At least that's my understanding.
 
That's a variation on the problem where you take more and more "stairsteps" from (0, 0) to (1, 1) getting a figure very close to the straight line from (0, 0) to (1, 1) but showing that the total length is always "2", not the length of the straight line, [math]\sqrt{2}[/math]. Essentially, the problem is that the stairsteps do not converge uniformly to the line.
 
HallsofIvy said:
Essentially, the problem is that the stairsteps do not converge uniformly to the line.

They do converge uniformly to the line.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top