What is the relationship between standing waves, tension, and velocity?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the relationship between standing waves, tension, and velocity in wave mechanics. It highlights key equations, such as velocity being the product of frequency and wavelength, and how tension affects wave properties. The calculations suggest that changes in frequency do not alter velocity, while adjustments in tension can impact wavelength. The user expresses confusion regarding the implications of tripling tension and how it relates to standing wave conditions. Clarification is sought on the calculations and their correctness, particularly in the context of standing wave requirements.
zell_D
Messages
57
Reaction score
0
upload.jpg

Homework Statement


see question 2a, b

Homework Equations


a) v=f(wavelength)
b) v= sqrt(F/(m/L))

The Attempt at a Solution


a) f=2.5 Hz, t=1.0 s and one wavelength on the graph is I guess 0.4 m?
v=2.5(.4)=1 m/s
b) f=5.0 Hz, tension same
v= sqrt(F/(m/L)) means that a change in frequency will not change the velocity?
1=5(wavelength)
wavelength= 0.2 m?


Homework Statement


see question 3a, b

Homework Equations


fn=(n/2L)(sqrt(F/(m/L))

The Attempt at a Solution


a)since this is a second harmonic, f2 = 2(2/L)(sqrt(F/(m/L)) = (1/L)(sqrt(F/(m/L))... wavelength = L

quadrupling F would mean that f=(1/L)(sqrt(4F/(m/L)) = (2/L)(sqrt(F/(m/L))
since f does not change, only way that these two will be equal is if the above is divided by 2
(2/2L)(sqrt(F/(m/L)) = (1/L)(sqrt(F/(m/L))
thus wavelength = 2L, so the new picture should just contain half of the wave?

b)tripling tension would mean that wavelength = sqrt(3)L... this shouldn't be possible right? since a standing wave needs to be connected at both ends (nodes) and having a wavelength of 1.7L would not connect on one end...please help! thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you should start off by looking at the first calculation. You've picked up an extra factor of 10 somewhere.
 
edited, but do things seem right or are they wrong 2b and 3a, b are the ones I am not sure on
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top