What is the relationship between variational calculus and integration by parts?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Travis091
  • Start date Start date
Travis091
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
I'm reading a book - and I've been stuck for a while on the same page. This is only a calculus question. We have the action:

S=\int d^4x \;\mathcal{L}

with the Lagrangian (density):

\mathcal{L}=\mathcal{L}(\phi,\dot{\phi},\nabla\phi)

We then vary S:

\delta S = \int d^4x \left[\frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial \phi}\delta\phi + \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial (\partial_\mu \phi)} \delta(\partial_\mu \phi)\right]

which is all fine and dandy, but now the next line says:
= \int d^4 x \left[\frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial \phi}-\partial_\mu \left(\frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial (\partial_\mu\phi)} \right) \right]\delta \phi + \partial_\mu \left(\frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial(\partial_\mu\phi)} \delta \phi\right)

Something like integration by parts must have befallen the second term...but I don't see it. I'm very inadequate in variational calculus, the mere sight of \delta throws me off.

So what happened there between the two lines? Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Indeed it is integration by parts. By the chain rule we have:

\partial_\mu\left(\frac{\partial\mathcal{L}}{\partial(\partial_ \mu\phi)}\delta\phi\right)=\partial_\mu\left(\frac{\partial\mathcal{L}}{\partial( \partial_\mu\phi)}\right)\delta\phi+\frac{\partial\mathcal{L}}{ \partial(\partial _\mu\phi)}\partial_\mu(\delta\phi)

The only additional step you need then is to know that the partial derivative commutes with the ##\delta## so that the above equation can be rearranged to:

\frac{\partial\mathcal{L}}{\partial(\partial_ \mu\phi)}\delta(\partial_\mu\phi)=\partial_\mu\left(\frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial(\partial_\mu\phi)}\delta\phi\right)-\partial_\mu\left(\frac{\partial\mathcal{L}}{\partial(\partial _\mu\phi)}\right)\delta\phi
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top