What is the role of wavefront in high explosives?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the distinction between detonation and combustion in high explosives, emphasizing that detonation occurs at supersonic speeds while combustion is subsonic. In internal combustion engines, avoiding detonation is crucial to prevent damage to components like piston heads, which poses challenges for technologies like Pulse Detonation Engines. The conversation references how deflagration, even in rapid flame scenarios, is significantly slower than detonation, which involves a supersonic shock wave. The definitions are not universally clear, as many still label engine reactions as "explosions." Understanding these differences is essential for advancements in explosive technologies and engine design.
Nim
Messages
74
Reaction score
0
How slow can an explosion possibly be?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think the generally accepted difference between "detonation" and "combustion" is wether the reaction takes place at supersonic speed for the medium being burned.

In an internal combustion engine, for example, care is taken to avoid a feul/O2/pressure combination that will "detonate" the fuel in the cylinder, because such an explosion will damage the piston heads (this is one of the main engineering obsticals to Pulse Detonation Engines). Although I've never seen it explicitly stated, the difference between detonation and combustion is always discussed in terms of a supersonic or a subsonic shockwave.

For example, http://www.popsci.com/popsci/aviation/article/0,12543,473272-2,00.html no pulse detonation states that...

In deflagration—even in "fast flame" situations ordinarily called explosions—that reaction moves at tens of meters per second at most. But in detonation, a supersonic shock wave slams down the tube...
.

Not a clear-cut definition, as most people would refer to what goes on inside an engine cylinder as an "explosion".
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Let there be a person in a not yet optimally designed sled at h meters in height. Let this sled free fall but user can steer by tilting their body weight in the sled or by optimal sled shape design point it in some horizontal direction where it is wanted to go - in any horizontal direction but once picked fixed. How to calculate horizontal distance d achievable as function of height h. Thus what is f(h) = d. Put another way, imagine a helicopter rises to a height h, but then shuts off all...
Back
Top