What Is the Second pKa of the Compound?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DJSkopelitis
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ph
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on determining the second pKa of a compound with two ionizable groups, one known at pKa 4.2 and the other between pKa 7 and 10. After adding HCl to a 1.0M solution, the pH drops to 4.2, leading to confusion about the calculations needed to find the second pKa. Participants suggest that at the second ionizable group's pKa, the pH would equal the pKa, implying it could be 8.17. The conversation emphasizes the simplicity of the problem, noting that when a group is half titrated, the pH equals its pKa, which simplifies the calculations. Overall, the key takeaway is that the second pKa is likely around 8.17, but clarity on the problem's context is essential.
DJSkopelitis
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
A Compound (not specified) has 2 ionizable groups. One is at pKa 4.2 and the other pKa is between 7 and 10. If you have 10.0 mL of a 1.0M solution at a pH of 8.17 and you add 10.0mL of 1.0M HCl which changes the pH to 4.2 what is the second pKa?

I tried working this problem out a few different ways and keep getting different answers. The last calculation I tried gave me a pKa of 4.44.

I'm using pH = pKa + log [A-]/[HA] I used pH = pKa-log[HA] / 2 to get an HA of 1.38. I plugged 8.17 and 4.2 in respectively as pH and pKa. Looking at it now that doesn't seem right.

But where I get stuck is how to add the 0.01 moles of HCl into the equation. I also was wondering if the answer is much more simple than I think it is. At the second ionizable group's pKa it would equal the pH right? So if that's the case is the pKa just 8.17? Or am I just completely wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
8.17 it is :smile:

I like simplicity of that question.
 
Maybe the question is not quite clear. I think it is not meant to say that 'the substance' has that pH when dissolved, rather it has been brought to that pH. Say someone dissolved some Na2X and already added some acid. Or they had dissolved some H2X and added an amount of NaOH which brought to pH up to 8.17.

It is convenient to remind yourself, and I think you are supposed to use it here, that when a group is half titrated half dissociated) then the pH = its pK and vice versa.

Then there are no very complex calculations at all here.

There is another related but not identical problem right now which you should understand if you have to be conversant and at ease with these problems.https://www.physicsforums.com/showpost.php?p=1889957&postcount=1

For cases I expect you will soon have to deal with where you do need more calculation it is always done from 3 and a half principles which are here https://www.physicsforums.com/showpost.php?p=1754973&postcount=3
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top