What is the Semimajor Axis of a Planet's Orbit in Different Reference Frames?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the semimajor axis of a planet's orbit from two different reference frames: one centered on the star and the other on the system's center of mass. It is noted that while the semimajor axis remains unchanged in terms of size and shape across inertial frames, the sun-centered frame is not inertial due to the sun's own motion around the center of mass. Key questions arise regarding the distances between the planet, the sun, and the center of mass at apofocus and perifocus, which are crucial for understanding the relationship between these distances and the semimajor axis. The participant expresses difficulty in visualizing orbits in a non-inertial frame and seeks clarification on how to incorporate these dynamics into equations. Ultimately, they report achieving answers for both reference frames that seem logical.
cellery
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


There is a planet of mass m_1 orbiting a star of mass m_2. One question is "What is the semimajor axis of the planet's orbit in the coordinate system centered at the star's center", and another is "What is the semimajor axis of the planet's orbit centered at the center of mass of the system.


Homework Equations


t^2/A^3 = 4pi^2/G(m_1+m_2)
^Kepler's Third Law

The Attempt at a Solution


Basically, as far as I can visualize this problem, the semimajor axis does not change when you switch the center of the system. The planet still has to make the same orbit, so the center of said orbit should still be the same. I have an answer, but I can't tell if I'm somehow supposed to modify it for one of these scenarios.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Think about this again. The orbit will have the same size and shape in any inertial frame, but the sun-centered frame is not inertial. The sun is orbiting the center of mass as well. What is the distance between the planet and the sun at apofucus and perifocus?
 
Last edited:
Alright, thanks, I'll give it a try. The problem is I just can't visualize what orbits look like if I have to account for a moving frame of reference as well. Everything changes. I don't quite see how to encorporate it into any equation, either.

But I'll see what I can do. The amount of help I need may be beyond the scope of what helpers are supposed to do.
 
Answering these questions might help:
  • What is the distance between the planet and system center of mass at apofocus and perifocus?
  • What is the relationship between the distance between the planet and system center of mass and the distance between the sun and system center of mass?
  • What is the distance between the planet and the sun at apofocus and perifocus?
  • What does this mean in terms of the semimajor axis?
 
Thanks. Based on that, I was able to get an answer for each reference frame. They make sense, as far as I can tell.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top