What is the Shell Method for Evaluating Volume of Revolved Solids?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Shell Method for evaluating the volume of solids of revolution involves setting up an integral based on the height and average radius of cylindrical shells. In this discussion, the solid is defined by the curve y = x³, bounded by y = 8 and x = 0. The height h(y) is determined as y^(1/3), while the average radius p(y) is simply y, as the integration is performed with respect to y. The confusion regarding the average radius was clarified, emphasizing the importance of understanding the geometric representation of the problem.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Shell Method in calculus
  • Familiarity with the concept of solids of revolution
  • Knowledge of integration techniques with respect to y
  • Basic understanding of functions and their graphs, specifically polynomial functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Shell Method in detail, focusing on examples involving different curves
  • Learn about the Disk and Washer Methods for comparison in volume calculations
  • Explore the concept of definite integrals and their applications in volume problems
  • Review the Larson Calculus textbook for additional practice problems and explanations
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, particularly those focusing on volume calculations of solids of revolution, as well as educators seeking to clarify the Shell Method for teaching purposes.

icesalmon
Messages
270
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement


Using the shell method, set up and evaluate the integral that gives the volume of the solid generated by revolving the plane region about the x-axis.
y = x3 bounded by y = 8, and x = 0.

Homework Equations


volume of a solid revolved around x-axis using the shell method.

The Attempt at a Solution


I have to find the height h(y) of some arbitrary shell and the average radius p(y) of all shells multiply them together and then integrate them, which I am fairly confident I can do so I am not going to worry about that at this time. For my height, h(y), I have a distance of "y" and I understand that. But the average radius p(y) is what I do not understand, the answer says that they are just multiplying the height by x(y), y1/3, which they do because they are integrating wrt y. But geometrically, I would have thought the average radius would be (8 - y1/3).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
icesalmon said:
I have to find the height h(y) of some arbitrary shell and the average radius p(y) of all shells multiply them together and then integrate them, which I am fairly confident I can do so I am not going to worry about that at this time. For my height, h(y), I have a distance of "y" and I understand that. But the average radius p(y) is what I do not understand, the answer says that they are just multiplying the height by x(y), y1/3, which they do because they are integrating wrt y. But geometrically, I would have thought the average radius would be (8 - y1/3).

Are you working out of the Larson book, by chance?
You got it mixed up, I think. y = 8 is a horizontal line, and it serves as the upper limit of integration. Your representative rectangles are parallel to the axis of revolution. h(y) is the distance from the y-axis to the curve, so it's actually y1/3. p(y) is the distance from the rectangle to the x-axis, which is y.
 
I understand it now, thank you. I am working out of larson 9e, is there another textbook for calculus that you can suggest would help teach the course better?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K