What is the significance of the Chandrasekhar boundary in neutron star research?

  • Thread starter Thread starter canopus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Boundary
AI Thread Summary
The Chandrasekhar limit defines the maximum mass of a white dwarf star, approximately 1.5 times that of the Sun, beyond which it collapses into a black hole or potentially a neutron star. This limit is crucial as it highlights the role of electron degeneracy pressure in supporting white dwarfs against gravitational collapse. Stars exceeding this mass will continue to collapse unless they lose mass during their lifecycle. Current research indicates that the upper mass limit for neutron stars is still uncertain, with estimates ranging from 2 to 3 solar masses, though most observed neutron stars are around 1.4 solar masses. Understanding the Chandrasekhar limit is essential for advancing knowledge in neutron star research and stellar evolution.
canopus
What does the Chandrasekhar boundary (or line, I'm not sure about it) means?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
(Chandrasekhar Limit.)

It's the limit of how massive a white dwarf star can be, and it's about 1 1/2 the mass of our Sun. Anything more massive than that will keep collapsing to form a Black Hole. This is not to say that a star twice as massive as the Sun will become a black hole, since it will blow off most of its mass before collapsing. But any star that still has more than Chandrasekhar Limit of its mass remaining when it collapses will just keep collapsing.
 
To be more specific, the Chandrasekhar limit is the mass of the largest possible white dwarf star, which is a particular type of star that is supported against gravitational collapse by electron degeneracy pressure. Electron degeneracy pressure is a sort of pressure due to the inability of electrons to occupy the same quantum states -- you may have heard of this as the "Pauli exclusion principle."

A white dwarf of more than the Chandrasekhar mass does not necessarily become a black hole -- it may collapse a bit further and become a neutron star, an even more peculiar object supported by a stronger form of degeneracy pressure due to neutrons.

- Warren
 
The upper mass limit for a neutron star is not very firm at this time. Estimates range anywhere from 2 to as much a 3 solar masses. I did some checking and was somewhat surprised to find it does not appear any neutron stars discovered to date have been measured to be much heavier than the lower limit of about 1.4 solar masses.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top