What is the significance of the Klein Paradox in particle physics?

go quantum!
Messages
54
Reaction score
0
The Klein Paradox is the name given to the following prediction of Klein Gordon's equations. If you send a current of electrons against a potential barrier of height V such that the energy of the incident electrons is less then V - m, you should observe a current of positrons coming out of the other side of the barrier.
Is this observed experimentally?

Actually, this is just one possible interpretation of the fact that we obtain a negative coefficient of transmission. We consider that a sufficiently high potential, in this particular case, V=E_inc + m, might create pairs of the incident particle and its antiparticle. The antiparticles have opposite charge, thus they will be compelled to pass the barrier. And that is why we observe the current of antiparticles coming out.
Is there other interpretations?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The concept of a potential well V(x) in relativity always leads to potential paradoxes. Here, an endless production of particle-antiparticle pairs out of seemingly nowhere. The solution is that V(x) must be maintained by an external energy source which supplies the energy needed for the particle creation.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...
Back
Top