What is the simplified trigonometry procedure?

Orion1
Messages
961
Reaction score
3

Because Trigonometry is a pre-requisite for Calculus, the purpose of this procedure is for use in 'calculator banned' Calculus courses, to eliminate the requirement of memorizing sixteen 'special angles' in Trigonometry to derive the correct solution.

Memorizing this procedure can produce all the correct solutions with knowledge of only the signs of four quadrants and three special angles in quadrant I.

This is the procedure that I developed in the 'rough', and I have not thoroughly tested it. Please let me know if there is a better 'symbolic' way to write this procedure or if this procedure produces any errors.
[/Color]

f_t( \theta_1 ) = \sin \theta_1, \cos \theta_1, \tan \theta_1 \; \text{etc.}

\theta_1 = \frac{n a}{b}
\theta_2 = \frac{\theta_1}{n} = \frac{a}{b}

\text{if} \; \theta_1 = \pi \; \text{then} \; \theta_2 = 0

f_q(\theta_1) = \text{sgn} [f_t (\theta_1)]

f_1(\theta_1) = f_q(\theta_1) \cdot f_t(\theta_2)

f_1(\theta_1) = \text{sgn} [f_t (\theta_1)] \cdot f_t(\theta_2)

\text{example:}
f_t( \theta_1 ) = \cos \frac{2 \pi}{3}
\theta_1 = \frac{2 \pi}{3} \; \; \; n = 2 \; \; \; a = \pi \; \; \; b = 3
\theta_2 = \frac{a}{b} = \frac{\pi}{3}
f_q \left( \frac{2 \pi}{3} \right) = \text{sgn} \left[ \cos \frac{2 \pi}{3} \right] = -1
f_1( \theta_1 ) = \cos \frac{2 \pi}{3} = \text{sgn} \left[ \cos \frac{2 \pi}{3} \right] \cdot \cos \frac{\pi}{3}
\cos \frac{2 \pi}{3} = - \cos \frac{\pi}{3} = - \frac{1}{2}
\boxed{\cos \frac{2 \pi}{3} = - \frac{1}{2}}
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Firstly, you haven't given any proof your for "theorem". So you cannot claim that your theorem is correct.
Orion1 said:
\text{if} \; \theta_1 = \pi \; \text{then} \; \theta_2 = 0
?
Why must it be so?? :confused:
f_1(\theta_1) = \text{sgn} [f_t (\theta_1)] \cdot f_t(\theta_2)
Ok, so you are saying that:
\cos \left( \frac{\pi}{3} \right) = \cos \left( \frac{2 \pi}{6} \right) = \mbox{sgn} \left( \cos \left( \frac{2 \pi}{6} \right) \right) \cos \left( \frac{\pi}{6} \right) = \frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}? Right?
 
Last edited:
\text{if} \; \theta_1 = \pi \; \text{then} \; \theta_2 = 0
VietDao29 said:
Why must it be so??

Because the area formed by the triangle with respect to origin and zero radians is zero. 0 and pi radians are the only two special angles where this is true and hence pi radians is the only exception to the formula.

A_t = \frac{a \cdot b}{2} \sin \pi = 0

This case would also be true for the formula:
\text{if} \; \theta_1 = \pi \; \text{then} \; \theta_2 = - \pi

A_t = \frac{a \cdot b}{2} \sin -\pi = 0

Right?
Negative.
\cos \left( \frac{\pi}{3} \right) \neq \frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}
\theta_2 \neq \frac{a}{2b}

Formula:
\cos \left( \frac{n a}{b} \right) = \text{sgn} \left[ \cos \left( \frac{n a}{b} \right) \right] \cos \left( \frac{a}{b} \right)

Proof:
\cos \left( \frac{n \pi}{3} \right) = \text{sgn} \left[ \cos \left( \frac{n \pi}{3} \right) \right] \cos \left( \frac{\pi}{3} \right) = \pm \frac{1}{2}

\text{if} \; \theta_1 = n \pi \; \text{then} \; \theta_2 = 0

\cos \left( n \pi \right) = \text{sgn} \left[ \cos \left( n \pi \right) \right] \cos \left( 0 \right) = \pm 1
[/Color]
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top