I What is the size of neutrons in a neutron star?

Cato
Messages
56
Reaction score
10
Does the pressure within a neutron star compress the neutrons to a smaller size?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No. However, it squashes the electron cloud onto the nucleus were they neutralize the protons. What you are left with is an atom all squshed into the nucleus which in turn is madeup of neutrons only. Further, because neutrons don't mind been near other neutrons and the pressure is insanely high, basically the entire star collapses into a gargantuan size nucleus, which is madeup of densely packed neutrons only. The size of this nucleus is really huge by nuclear sizes. It measures no less than 11km and no more than 11.5km in diameter, depending of how closed the neutrons are squeezed. The mass is even more mesmerizing! 1 - 2 Solar masses, all neatly packed in an 11km ball! I hope this helps.
 
Last edited:
Yes, thanks. But imagine a neutron star just a milligram less in mass than required to collapse it to a singularity. Are the neutrons really still the same size as they are without that pressure? Do the quarks in the neutrons get pressed closer together?
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top