MHB What is the smallest time from the data given

  • Thread starter Thread starter karush
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Data Time
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the smallest time from the equation \(\sin(120\pi t)=\frac{2}{5}\). It is clarified that the smallest time corresponds to one cycle, and multiple solutions for \(t\) exist based on the equation derived. The expression for \(t\) is given as \(t=\frac{n}{120}+\frac{(-1)^n}{120\pi} \sin^{-1}\frac{2}{5}\), where \(n\) is a non-negative integer. Substituting \(n=0\) yields the smallest value for \(t\), though further proof is suggested to confirm this minimum. The conversation emphasizes the need for clarity in the definition of "smallest time" in the context of the problem.
karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/1729

before I proceed with b, c, and d. what really is meant by the smallest time. does this mean the time of one cycle. there are multiple answers if it calculated for t. the steps I used give one but that may not be the correct process. no ans given
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
karush said:
https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/1729

before I proceed with b, c, and d. what really is meant by the smallest time. does this mean the time of one cycle. there are multiple answers if it calculated for t. the steps I used give one but that may not be the correct process. no ans given

Hi karush, :)

You have obtained,

\[\sin(120\pi t)=\frac{2}{5}\]

Generally, the values that satisfies this equation are given by,

\[120\pi t=n\pi+(-1)^n \sin^{-1}\frac{2}{5}\]

where \(n\in \mathbb{Z}^{+}\cup\{0\}\). Therefore we have,

\[ t=\frac{n}{120}+\frac{(-1)^n}{120\pi} \sin^{-1}\frac{2}{5}\]

So by substituting \(n=0,\,1,\,2\,\cdots\) and so on we can see that at \(n=0\), \(t\) attains it's smallest value. That's not a proof though, I guess to show that \(t(n)=\frac{n}{120}+\frac{(-1)^n}{120\pi} \sin^{-1}\frac{2}{5}\) has a minimum at \(n=0\) in a more abstract manner will need more work. I can't think of any simple method. :confused:
 
Good morning I have been refreshing my memory about Leibniz differentiation of integrals and found some useful videos from digital-university.org on YouTube. Although the audio quality is poor and the speaker proceeds a bit slowly, the explanations and processes are clear. However, it seems that one video in the Leibniz rule series is missing. While the videos are still present on YouTube, the referring website no longer exists but is preserved on the internet archive...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
54
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K