What is the Social Environment Like for Scientific Computing Jobs?

  • Thread starter Thread starter darkchild
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Computing Work
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the work environment in scientific computing and similar computer-based fields, particularly regarding social interaction. The individual expresses a desire for a solitary work setting, primarily focused on computer tasks. Responses indicate a mixed experience; while some find the work solitary, others report frequent meetings and interruptions from colleagues seeking assistance. The level of social interaction appears to depend significantly on the specific project and company culture, with some professionals experiencing daily meetings and constant communication, while others have more independent roles. Overall, the consensus suggests that while solitary work is possible, collaboration and communication are often integral to the job.
darkchild
Messages
153
Reaction score
0
I am planning a career in scientific computing and wondering what the work environment is like, not just in that specific field but any field that's based on computer work. I'm specifically interested in how much social interaction the job might involve. My dream job is just to be left alone in an office with a computer. I understand that people need to communicate and work in teams on large projects, and that there will be meetings sometimes, that's fine.

So, if you work with computers, do you find yourself in meetings every week, constantly being interrupted by co-workers who have questions, etc.? Did it vary by the type of company you worked for?

Some people have said that it's generally pretty solitary work, others have disagreed, so...thanks for any input.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Meetings every week? More like every day!

And people came in with questions all the time. (And vice versa)
 
It all depends on the project you're involved with.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Back
Top