What is the solution for the attached equation?

eahaidar
Messages
69
Reaction score
1
Good afternoon,
i was just wondering if this equation is possibly solvable where I(z) is a function of z. The equation is:
I(z)=cosh(1/2 ∫I(z)dz)
I know it looks stupid but is it possible? How would you approach this problem?
Thank you.
 

Attachments

  • eq.png
    eq.png
    1.1 KB · Views: 464
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Try to derive both side with respect to z. This will give you an ordinary differential equation. Then try to solve it in another way.
 
Thanks for the response. However I get hyperbolic sinh which just makes it much worse. :(
 
Maybe first set $$arcosh(I(z))=\frac {1}{2} \int_z^L I(x)dx $$ and then take the derivate?
 
eahaidar said:
Thanks for the response. However I get hyperbolic sinh which just makes it much worse. :(

If you introduce J(z) = \sinh\left(\frac12 \int I(z)\,dz\right) then you can get the two-dimensional system <br /> I&#039; = \frac12 IJ \\<br /> J&#039; = \frac12 I^2<br /> which can be solved numerically subject to given initial conditions (which, like cosh and sinh, must satisfy I(0)^2 - J(0)^2 = 1). Alternatively, you can construct power series iteratively by starting with I_0(z) = I(0), J_0(z) = J(0) and using the recurrence relation <br /> I_{n+1}(z) = I(0) + \frac12 \int_0^z I_n(t)J_n(t)\,dt, \\<br /> J_{n+1}(z) = J(0) + \frac12 \int_0^z I_n^2(t)\,dt.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top