What is the Solution to Implicit Differentiation Homework with Given Values?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around implicit differentiation in the context of a relationship defined by the equation ##\frac{1}{a}=\frac{1}{b}+\frac{1}{c}##. Participants are tasked with finding the rate of change of a variable, ##\frac{da}{dt}##, given specific values for ##a## and ##b##, as well as rates of change for ##b## and ##c##.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the need to differentiate the original equation with respect to time, questioning the correctness of assuming ##\frac{da}{db} = 1##. There are suggestions to express ##\frac{da}{dt}## in terms of ##c## and to find the value of ##c## using the original equation. Some participants explore the application of the chain rule and total derivatives in this context.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with various techniques for implicit differentiation being considered. Participants are clarifying their understanding of the relationship between the variables and how to apply differentiation correctly. There is no explicit consensus yet, but several productive directions have been suggested.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of a homework assignment, which may limit the information available for solving the problem. The discussion includes questioning assumptions about the relationships between the variables involved.

jisbon
Messages
475
Reaction score
30
Homework Statement
Let ##\frac{1}{a}=\frac{1}{b}+\frac{1}{c}##
If ##\frac{db}{dt}=0.2## ,## \frac{dc}{dt}=0.3## , Find ##\frac{da}{dt}## when a=80 , b=100
Relevant Equations
-
Homework Statement: Let ##\frac{1}{a}=\frac{1}{b}+\frac{1}{c}##
If ##\frac{db}{dt}=0.2## ,## \frac{dc}{dt}=0.3## , Find ##\frac{da}{dt}## when a=80 , b=100
Homework Equations: -

Since we are supposed to find ##\frac{da}{dt}##, I can deduce that:
## \frac{da}{dt} =\frac{da}{dc}\cdot\frac{dc}{dt} = (\frac{db}{dc}\cdot\frac{da}{db})\cdot\frac{dc}{dt} =((\frac{db}{dt}\cdot\frac{dt}{dc})\cdot\frac{da}{db})\cdot\frac{dc}{dt} = ((\frac{0.2}{0.3}\cdot\frac{da}{db})\cdot0.3## = Answer?

To find ##\frac{da}{db}##, I need to differentiate implicitly, which gives me ##\frac{da}{db}##=1 ? (Not sure if it's correct), hence the answer is 1*0.2/0.3*0.3?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jisbon said:
I need to differentiate implicitly, which gives me ##\frac{da}{db}##=1 ? (Not sure if it's correct)
No, that's not correct. Differentiate both sides of the original equation with respect to t, not b. Assume that each of a, b, c is a function of t. You will get an equation with the three derivatives wrt t in it, and the three amounts a, b, c. Making the above numeric substitutions you will get an equation that relates ##\frac{da}{dt}## to c. You can rearrange that to express ##\frac{da}{dt}## in terms of c, which is what I presume they want you to do.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jisbon
in addition to what @andrewkirk says, you can also find c when a=80,b=100 by using the original equation.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jisbon
andrewkirk said:
No, that's not correct. Differentiate both sides of the original equation with respect to t, not b. Assume that each of a, b, c is a function of t. You will get an equation with the three derivatives wrt t in it, and the three amounts a, b, c. Making the above numeric substitutions you will get an equation that relates ##\frac{da}{dt}## to c. You can rearrange that to express ##\frac{da}{dt}## in terms of c, which is what I presume they want you to do.
Delta2 said:
in addition to what @andrewkirk says, you can also find c when a=80,b=100 by using the original equation.
Will it be something like: ##\frac{-1}{a^2}\frac{da}{dt}=\frac{-1}{b^2}\frac{db}{dt}+\frac{-1}{c^2}\frac{dc}{dt}##?
 
Oh ok. Then I guess I could solve the question easily now. Thanks for the clarification :smile:
 
It is often seen as an application of the chain rule as others said. First equation sets up a as a function of b,c and it is assumed both b,c are functions of t. Then we apply the total derivative which uses the chain rule ,i.e, we have a=a(b(t),c(t)) and we go from there to define da/dt.
 
WWGD said:
It is often seen as an application of the chain rule as others said. First equation sets up a as a function of b,c and it is assumed both b,c are functions of t. Then we apply the total derivative which uses the chain rule ,i.e, we have a=a(b(t),c(t)) and we go from there to define da/dt.
Or more simply, without using the total derivative...
Since a is a function of b and c, with b and c being functions of t, then a is also a function of t.
Just differentiate all with respect to t using the chain rule, exactly as @jisbon shows in post #4.
 
Mark44 said:
Or more simply, without using the total derivative...
Since a is a function of b and c, with b and c being functions of t, then a is also a function of t.
Just differentiate all with respect to t using the chain rule, exactly as @jisbon shows in post #4.
I don't know of any setup for chain rule using two variables that does not use the total derivative. I have seen, of course, for one variable but not for two or more. But I guess it comes down to the same in the end.
 
  • #10
WWGD said:
I don't know of any setup for chain rule using two variables that does not use the total derivative. I have seen, of course, for one variable but not for two or more.
You don't need to treat a as a function of two variables; i.e., a = f(b, c).
All you need is to treat a, b, and c as implicit functions of t, and then differentiate implicitly, as hinted at in the title of this thread. IOW, you can interpret the original equation to mean ##\frac 1 {a(t)} = \frac 1 {b(t)} + \frac 1 {c(t)}##.

BTW, this is standard fare in first quarter/first semester calculus, usually presented before any discussion of the total derivative.
 
  • #11
Well, now the OP knows two techniques and can choose which one to apply. I get to decide since i have 4444 messages, using 44 twice--- not just once;).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K