MHB What is the solution to the definite integral $\int^1_0 x^2 e^x \, dx$?

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around evaluating the definite integral $\int^1_0 x^2 e^x \, dx$ using integration by parts, leading to the result $e - 2$. A participant raises a question about a definite integral calculator yielding $2 - e$ and whether the two results are equivalent. It is clarified that $2 - e$ is negative, which contradicts the expectation of a positive area under the curve, confirming that $e - 2$ is indeed the correct answer. The conversation emphasizes careful notation and understanding of integral properties, ultimately concluding that the positive area reinforces the correctness of the result.
shamieh
Messages
538
Reaction score
0
Evaluate the following integrals.

a) $\int^1_0 x e^x dx$

So integrating by parts we get

$u = x $ $vu = e^x dx$
$du = dx$ $ v = e^x$

$uv - \int vdu = x e^x - \int^1_0 e^x dx$

$$xe^x - e^x |^1_0 = 1$$

b) $$\int^1_0 x^2 e^x \, dx$$

Integrating by parts we get

$$u = x^2 $$ $$ dv = e^x dx$$
$$du = 2xdx$$ $$ v = e^x$$

$$uv - \int vdu = x^2 e^x - \int^1_0 e^x 2x = e^1 - 2 $$
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I would be more careful about notation but your results are correct. Congratulations! (Clapping)
 
Fantini said:
I would be more careful about notation but your results are correct. Congratulations! (Clapping)

Any idea why the definite integral calculator is somehow getting 2 - e? are they equivalent?
 
Here is a new approach that you might like

Define

$$f(x) = \int^1_0 e^{xt} \, dt $$

Then integrating with respect to $t$ we have

$$f(x) = \int^1_0 e^{xt} \, dt = \frac{e^{x}-1}{x}$$

Now differentiate both sides with respect ot $x$ we have

$$f'(x) = \int^1_0 t\, e^{xt} \, dt = \frac{xe^{x}-e^x+1}{x^2}$$

Putting $x=1$ we have

$$f'(1) = \int^1_0 t\, e^{t} \, dt = 1$$

Diff w.r.t to $x$ again we have

$$f''(x) = \int^1_0 t^2\, e^{xt} \, dt = \frac{x^2 \,e^{x}-2(xe^x-e^x +1)}{x^3}$$

$$f''(1) = \int^1_0 t^2\, e^{t} \, dt = e-2$$

Any idea why the definite integral calculator is somehow getting 2 - e? are they equivalent?
The answer $2-e<0$ is not possible since the integral must be positive.
 
No, \displaystyle \begin{align*} 2 - e = - \left( e - 2 \right) \end{align*}. They are not equivalent.

e - 2 is definitely correct. You can tell because the function is always positive, so the area is always above the x-axis and thus must be positive.
 
Last edited:
Nevermind I se what I did wrong
 
Thread 'Problem with calculating projections of curl using rotation of contour'
Hello! I tried to calculate projections of curl using rotation of coordinate system but I encountered with following problem. Given: ##rot_xA=\frac{\partial A_z}{\partial y}-\frac{\partial A_y}{\partial z}=0## ##rot_yA=\frac{\partial A_x}{\partial z}-\frac{\partial A_z}{\partial x}=1## ##rot_zA=\frac{\partial A_y}{\partial x}-\frac{\partial A_x}{\partial y}=0## I rotated ##yz##-plane of this coordinate system by an angle ##45## degrees about ##x##-axis and used rotation matrix to...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K