What is the speed of the river in km/hr?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ijd5000
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Boat Kinematics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the speed of a river based on a boat's travel times downstream and upstream. The boat travels 15 km downstream in 3.1 hours, resulting in a speed of 4.84 km/hr, and 5.1 hours upstream, yielding a speed of 2.94 km/hr. Participants clarify that the river's speed affects the boat's effective speed, with downstream speeds being the sum and upstream speeds being the difference of the boat's speed and the river's speed. The problem can be approached by setting equations based on these principles to find the river's speed. The conversation emphasizes using the relationship between distance, rate, and time to solve for the unknown.
ijd5000
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
a boat takes 3.1 hours to travel 15 km down a river, then takes 5.1 hours to travel the same distance upstream. how fast is the river traveling.

I found the boat is traveling at 4.84km/hr down the stream and 2.94 km/hr up it. not sure where to go next.

Any help would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
d=rt
 
Let's say the river's speed is 1 kph and the boat's speed is 2 kph then the boat will travel downstream at 3 kph and upstream at 1 kph. So when you go downstream you add the speeds, but when going upstream, you subtract the river's speed from the boat's speed. Try working that backwards.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top