What Is the Strong Nuclear Force and How Does It Work?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the strong nuclear force and the process of beta decay. The initial poster expresses gratitude for learning to identify unreliable sources while researching the strong nuclear force. They reference a specific website that inaccurately claims that a neutron can decay into a hydrogen atom, which prompts a clarification from another participant. Warren points out that a free neutron decays into a proton, an electron, and an electron anti-neutrino, emphasizing that a neutron within an atomic nucleus is typically stable unless there are excess neutrons. He critiques the original article for its misleading simplification, noting that it incorrectly suggests that beta decay directly produces hydrogen. The conversation highlights the importance of accurate scientific explanations and the pitfalls of oversimplification in discussing complex topics like nuclear physics.
icvotria
Messages
51
Reaction score
1
Thank goodness...

...PF has taught me how to sniff out a crackpot. I was wondering about the strong nuclear force and how it worked and stuff and I thought I should do some research before I posted another incredibly open-ended question here :rolleyes: so I googled "strong nuclear force explained" and this is the only thing that came up: www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/File026.html[/URL]. This was my favourite part [QUOTE]every neutron has the potential of radioactively decaying into a hydrogen atom...the neutron, in any particular atom when it radioactively decays emits 1 proton, 1 electron, and perhaps 1 neutrino.[/QUOTE] I love that perhaps! :smile:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The decay of the neutron is called "beta decay," and it's products are indeed a proton, an electron, and an electron anti-neutrino. You're right though, there's no "perhaps" about it -- it's always there.

- Warren
 
Not exactly.

A free neutron will decay into a proton, electron (beta particle) and electron-associated anti-neutrino. The statement about emitted is awkward.

A neutron inside an atomic nucleus is usually stable, unless there is an excess of neutrons. If beta-decay does occur, the neutron decays to a proton, but it does not produce a hydrogen atom. The charge on the nucleus will increase by 1.
 
In the article he's trying to say that the hydrogen atom is the most elementary of all particles and that's his example. It cracked me up. It's like 'beta decay = 1 elecron + 1 proton = Hydrogen oh yeah, and that other thing, but let's forget about that, it's not important and it ruins my theory'
 
icvotria,

Now -that's- crackpottery. :smile:

- Warren
 
Similar to the 2024 thread, here I start the 2025 thread. As always it is getting increasingly difficult to predict, so I will make a list based on other article predictions. You can also leave your prediction here. Here are the predictions of 2024 that did not make it: Peter Shor, David Deutsch and all the rest of the quantum computing community (various sources) Pablo Jarrillo Herrero, Allan McDonald and Rafi Bistritzer for magic angle in twisted graphene (various sources) Christoph...
Thread 'My experience as a hostage'
I believe it was the summer of 2001 that I made a trip to Peru for my work. I was a private contractor doing automation engineering and programming for various companies, including Frito Lay. Frito had purchased a snack food plant near Lima, Peru, and sent me down to oversee the upgrades to the systems and the startup. Peru was still suffering the ills of a recent civil war and I knew it was dicey, but the money was too good to pass up. It was a long trip to Lima; about 14 hours of airtime...
Back
Top