What Is the Substance of Space and Its Role in Our Perception?

  • Thread starter Thread starter omin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Space
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the nature of space and its relationship to mass and perception. It posits that all sensory experiences, whether direct or through instruments, require mass to trigger reactions that lead to thought. Space is debated as either a relational concept between objects or a substance in its own right, with spatiomaterialism suggesting that space possesses both essential and existential properties of substance. The conversation also touches on the idea that space's properties, such as bending and limiting speed, imply it has its own substance. Ultimately, the role of gravity is highlighted as an integral part of the space concept.
omin
Messages
187
Reaction score
1
What is this thing we call space?

All things that we sense with our fives senses have the property mass. Why? Because, objective mass is necessary to cause the chain of action and reaction from environment to sense to thought.

All things we sense only with instruments have the property mass. Why? Because, obejective mass is necessary to cause the chain of action and reaction from environment to instrument to sense to thought.

All things that come to the mind must come first through the five senses.

So, what is space?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
space

Its the relation of some stuff to other stuff. Or is it stuff in its own right?
 
mee said:
Its the relation of some stuff to other stuff. Or is it stuff in its own right?

Spatiomaterialism assumes that space is a substance by our definition, for it assumes that each part of space has both the essential and the existential aspects of the nature of substance as substance. The parts of space are all the locations in a single, three dimensional space.
 
You posted this already in TD. Its still wrong (and it belongs there, not here).
 
Rader said:
Spatiomaterialism assumes that space is a substance by our definition, for it assumes that each part of space has both the essential and the existential aspects of the nature of substance as substance. The parts of space are all the locations in a single, three dimensional space.
I would think that since space has the property of bending and limiting speed, then it has a substance of its own. Property=substance.
 
Mike2 said:
I would think that since space has the property of bending and limiting speed, then it has a substance of its own. Property=substance.

Gravity does that but then gravity is part of space.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...

Similar threads

Back
Top