What is the supremum and infimum of the set B = {x\in\mathbb{R} : sinx \geq 0}?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Valhalla
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Set Supremum
Valhalla
Messages
69
Reaction score
0
let B = \{x\in\mathbb{R} : sinx \geq 0 \}

find the supremum and infimum of this set.

Ok well, since it is periodic I guess the point would be to note that the set will repeat ever 2\pi

So then if we consider just between 0 and 2\pi

supremum = \pi
infimum = 0

if we consider all \mathbb{R}

here is where I'm confused. The supremum would just be the N\pi when N is an odd integer. Should I just state the function is periodic it will repeat between 0 and 2\pi
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Proceed methodically from the definition. M is a supremum of B if it is the smallest superior bound. But is B even bounded superiorly?
 
quasar987 said:
Proceed methodically from the definition. M is a supremum of B if it is the smallest superior bound. But is B even bounded superiorly?


Ok so I think I see what your saying. The set will not be bounded above or below except by plus or minus infinity b/c the function is periodic. I can always find a larger number in the reals that satifies sin(x) greater than or equal to 0. Therefore the set would have a supremum or positive infinity and a infimum of negative infinity.

Oh, I made typo in the original problem x\in\mathbb{R}_e
 
That is the idea, yeah. You'd have to write a few equations though for it to be considered a proof. You'd have to show rigorously that given any number in B, there is always another number in B that is superior(resp. inferior) to it.(What is \mathbb{R}_e??)
 
Our professor stated that \mathbb{R}_e is the extended reals which contains plus and minus infinity. This course is an analysis for electrical engineers we get a crash course in a little bit of set theory then a bunch about complex functions with linear algebra of complex functions. We don't have a textbook for this course and the professors only written some of the course notes so I'm kind of flying blind on what is going on here. Thanks for the help!
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top