What is the surface height of a still pond after an object is dropped in it?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Michael12345
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pond Rock
AI Thread Summary
A project is being developed to calculate the surface height of water after an object is dropped, focusing on a snapshot rather than a time-dependent equation. The individual is seeking resources to aid in this mathematical and physical analysis, expressing a willingness to engage with complex concepts. A recommended resource is a website from the University of Texas, along with the book "Water Waves" by J J Stoker, which is available online and contains relevant sections on surface motion due to disturbances. The discussion emphasizes the need for formulas and visual aids to enhance understanding. Overall, the conversation highlights the pursuit of academic resources for a specific physics problem.
Michael12345
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I had an idea for a project that would make use of a formula for the surface height of a body of water after an object was dropped in it. I wouldn't need a time-dependent equation, just a nice snapshot...although a general equation (a function of x, y, and t) would be nice. I haven't had much luck finding a solution online, but I'll keep looking. I'm comfortable with undergrad level math and physics, so I don't mind doing some heavy lifting. And if you don't have the time, but can point me to a resource or two, I'd appreciate that, as well.

Thanks,
Michael
 
Physics news on Phys.org
An excellent and very thorough book on the subject is "Water Waves" by J J Stoker. And by good luck the full text is available online at www.archive.org. Sect 6.6 is "Discussion of the motion of the free surface due to disturbances initiated when the water is at rest." On or about p 170. Included are formulas, graphs and some photos, although the photos don't show up very well online.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top