I What is the term for a set of loci that are the same?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter swampwiz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Set Term
swampwiz
Messages
567
Reaction score
83
I'm thinking the term is congruent.

For example, let's say there are 2 parametric lines:

s0( t ) = < 2 , 1 > t + < 0 , - 3 >

s1( t ) = < -18 , -9 > t + < -6 , -6 >

The loci for both are the same line, just that one proceeds in the opposite as the other (and at a high rate) per change in parameter, and such that

s1( - t ) = s0( 9 t + 3 )

Surely, there must be a term for this.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
'The loci are identical' is the way I would express it.
 
swampwiz said:
For example, let's say there are 2 parametric lines
s0( t ) = < 2 , 1 > t + < 0 , - 3 >

s1( t ) = < -18 , -9 > t + < -6 , -6 >
I would say that the equations are equivalent, as both parametric equations describe the same set of points.

For your parametric line, there are an infinite number of parametric representations. For example, the direction along your line is given by the vector <2, 1>. Any scalar multiple of this vector will also have the same direction. In your second equation the direction vector is <-18, -9>, which is -9 * <2, 1>.
Also, the equation could be written using any point on the line.

In slope intercept form, the equation of the line is y = (1/2) x - 3, which could also be written as 2y - x + 6 = 0, and in many other ways as well.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top