What is the theory behind analytical continuations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Alamino
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Analytical
AI Thread Summary
Analytical continuation is a method used to extend the domain of an analytic function defined by a power series within a disc to a larger connected open set U. The uniqueness of this extension depends on whether U is simply connected; if it is, there can be at most one extension. However, if U is not simply connected, such as when it includes loops encircling points outside the set, uniqueness may fail. Key resources for understanding this topic include complex analysis textbooks like Hille's and Cartan's, as well as lecture notes from Beardon. Riemann surfaces play a crucial role in this theory, providing a framework for maximal analytic extensions.
Alamino
Messages
69
Reaction score
0
Is there any treatment of a general character about analytical continuations? They're largely used in physics and in a lot of mathematical tricks for calculate integrals, but I have never seen a general theory? Where can I find it?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Any good book on complex analysis should contain a treatment of it. Alternately look at Beardon's web page at dpmms.cam.ac.uk for any lecture notes he may have. It might also help googling for Riemann surfaces, or the Riemann mapping theorem as they are basically about analytic continuation across boundaries, albeit in a more advanced way than you may need. Try googling for reflection principle too.
 
a good book is hille's analytic function theory, or cartan's analytic functions of one and several complex variables. also george mackey's harvard notes on complex variables. I think I know something about it too, but I don't feel like writing you a text right now. if you ask a question i will try to answer.

the basic question is to take a complex power series converging in a disc, and consider a connected open set U containing that disc, and then ask for an extension into U, of the analytic function defined in the disc by the power series. it may or may not exist and may or may not be unique.


If the connected set U is also "simply connected" which means it contains no loops that encircle points outside the set, then there is at most one extension to the whole set U.

as a "counterexample" to uniqueness, the complement U of the origin is not simply connected, since it contains a loop, namely the unit circle that encircles the origin, which is outside the set. The power series for ln(z) which converges in the unit disc centered at z=1, has no analytic extension into the entire set U, but has exactly one such extension into any set of form "U minus a ray extending from the origin to infinity".


If U is a connected open set, and if there exists a (unique) analytic extension of your function into every simply connected (open) subset of U, then in fact there is a maximal analytic extension, not into any subset of the plane, but rather into a simply connected "covering" of the set U.

This topic, Riemann surfaces, was the subject of a groundbreaking book by the famous Hermann Weyl, also known for his work on group representations.

I hope I have not said anything false.
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
3
Replies
108
Views
10K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Back
Top