I What is the thickness of the atmosphere?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on estimating the thickness of Earth's atmosphere using diffusive equilibrium principles, leading to an initial estimate of approximately 10^5 meters, significantly higher than the actual value of about 10^4 meters. The calculations involve setting the difference in chemical potential to zero, incorporating gravitational and internal potentials. The discrepancy in estimates is attributed to an underestimation of the mass of air molecules by a factor of six. Various methods to estimate atmospheric thickness are suggested, including kinetic energy calculations and pressure ratios, all converging around a value of approximately 9 km. The conversation highlights the complexity of atmospheric boundaries and the interplay between gravitational forces and molecular behavior.
Shing
Messages
141
Reaction score
1
I was thinking of a Fermi-question: the thickness of atmosphere with diffusive equilibrium. And I estimated roughly 10^{5}m (where it should be ~10^{4}m). The difference of order of magnitude to real thickness is 1 (from Wiki).

I had a lot of fun, and I am looking for interesting ways other than chemical potential to estimate the thickness of Earth's atmosphere.

---

Basically, I started with assumptions:

- thermal equilibrium
- diffusive equilibrium

such that I can set up the difference in chemical potential is zero, that is equal to the difference in external chemical potential (gravitational potential) plus the difference in internal potential (assuming air molecular just ideal gas); mathematically:

$$\Delta\mu=0=\Delta\mu_{ext}+\Delta\mu_{int}$$

which is

$$0=\Delta\mu_{gra}+\Delta\mu_{indeal}$$

$$0=-GM_{earth}m\Big( \frac{1}{R+\Delta h} - \frac{1}{R} \Big)+k_BT\ln\Big(\frac{n_2}{n_1}\Big)$$

Setting the ratio of n_2, n_1 to be 0.1 (so I defined the height where density of air goes from unity - ground - to 0.1 as "thickness"), and m the mass of air molecular to be 10^{-26}kg, T to be 300K, then we will eventually obtain: $$\Delta h \approx 10^5m$$
 
  • Like
Likes Dale
Physics news on Phys.org
You underestimate the mass of a molecule in the air by a factor 6, that leads to most of the difference.
There are many ways to get the same expression, but they all lead to good estimates.
 
mfb said:
You underestimate the mass of a molecule in the air by a factor 6
Thanks for telling me!

mfb said:
There are many ways to get the same expression, but they all lead to good estimates.
I am all ears :)
 
You can calculate the kinetic energy of a gas molecule, and see how high it can get if it moves straight up with this energy.
You can calculate the ratio of pressure difference to pressure needed to balance a pocket of gas against gravity.
And probably a few more.

They all boil down to ##h=\frac{kT}{mg} \approx 9\,km## with additional prefactors of ln(2) or similar depending on what you do.
 
I would tend to think that the atmosphere ends in the same way the heliosphere ends - i.e., where the particles in intersolar space are in equilibrium with the particles escaping Earth. Of course, Von Karman had a great definition in which a standard aircraft body would need to be going so fast to maintain altitude that it would be in orbit.
 
Thread 'Is there a white hole inside every black hole?'
This is what I am thinking. How much feasible is it? There is a white hole inside every black hole The white hole spits mass/energy out continuously The mass/energy that is spit out of a white hole drops back into it eventually. This is because of extreme space time curvature around the white hole Ironically this extreme space time curvature of the space around a white hole is caused by the huge mass/energy packed in the white hole Because of continuously spitting mass/energy which keeps...
Back
Top