What is the time to reach 98% of terminal velocity?

  • Thread starter Thread starter rockytriton
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics Type
rockytriton
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
Ok, there's a differential equation that is:

dv/dt = 9.8 - (v/5), v(0) = 0

to represent a falling object. So the solution ends up being

v = 49(1 - e^t/5)

and the equilibrium solution (terminal velocity) is v = 49.

Now I have a problem that says "find the time that must elapse for the object to reach 98% of its limiting velocity"

To do this, I am doing the following:

terminal velocity * 98% = the equation...
49 * 0.98 = 49(1 - e^t/5)

div by 49...
0.98 = 1 - e^t/5

move 1 over and multiply both sides by -1...
1 - 0.98 = e^t/5

use ln...
ln(1 - 0.98) = t/5

mult by 5...

5 * ln(1 - 0.98) = t

so:
t = -19.56


now... in the book's solution, it states:
T = 5 * ln(50) ~= 19.56

So, where is this 50 coming from? And my answer looks to be right except for the sign, where did I go wrong?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It should be v = 49(1 - e^(-t/5)). Your solution has the velocity exponentially growing.
 
thanks! I knew it would be something stupid that I missed. I still don't get where they got the "5 * ln(50)" from though...
 
0.98 = 1 - e-t/5

e-t/5= 1-0.98= 0.02= 2/100= 1/50
That's where the "50" is from.

Now -t/5= ln(1/50)= -ln(50) so t= 5 ln(50).
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top