Differential equation dv/dt = 9.8 - v/5, v(0) = 0

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a differential equation related to the motion of a falling object, specifically the initial value problem defined by dv/dt = 9.8 - v/5 with the initial condition v(0) = 0. Participants are exploring the time required for the object to reach 98% of its limiting velocity and the distance fallen during that time.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the integration process used to find the distance fallen and question the limits of integration. There are inquiries about the calculations leading to the perceived incorrect results.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants sharing their interpretations and results. Some have indicated they have verified their answers, while others are questioning the methods used by the original poster and discussing potential issues with the integration limits.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of a constant of integration that may affect the evaluation of the distance function p(t), as well as the need for clarity on the integration process used by the original poster.

e^(i Pi)+1=0
Messages
246
Reaction score
1
A falling object satisfies the initial value problem:

dv/dt = 9.8 - v/5, v(0) = 0

1.Find the time that must elapse for the object to reach 98% of its limiting velocity.

answer: t = 19.56, and for completeness, v = -49e-t/5 + 49

2.How far does the object fall in the time found in part a?

Integrating yields the wrong answer, which should = 718.34?

p(t) = 245e-t/5 + 49t
 
Physics news on Phys.org
e^(i Pi)+1=0 said:
A falling object satisfies the initial value problem:

dv/dt = 9.8 - v/5, v(0) = 0

1.Find the time that must elapse for the object to reach 98% of its limiting velocity.

answer: t = 19.56, and for completeness, v = -49e-t/5 + 49

2.How far does the object fall in the time found in part a?

Integrating yields the wrong answer, which should = 718.34?

p(t) = 245e-t/5 + 49t
What was it you integrated, and how did you do it?
 
SammyS said:
What was it you integrated, and how did you do it?
The p(t) at the bottom of the OP is suggests he/she integrated v(t) from part 1. Must be a problem with the limits of integration. I've gotten the right answer, and double-checked it.
 
SithsNGiggles said:
The p(t) at the bottom of the OP is suggests he/she integrated v(t) from part 1. Must be a problem with the limits of integration. I've gotten the right answer, and double-checked it.
Fair enough !

To OP:

What is p(19.56) - p(0) ?
 
It was pointed out to me elsewhere that was how to do it. I did an indefinite integral and then evaluated p(19.56). I'm having a difficult time intuiting why that would yield a wrong answer though.
 
e^(i Pi)+1=0 said:
It was pointed out to me elsewhere that was how to do it. I did an indefinite integral and then evaluated p(19.56). I'm having a difficult time intuiting why that would yield a wrong answer though.
Because for, p(t), as you have it, p(0) ≠ 0 . You could have used a constant of integration to make p(0) = 0 .
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K