What is the trough in destructive interference of EM?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies that the trough of an electromagnetic wave does not represent "negative energy photons," but rather is a point of minimum electric/magnetic field strength, opposite to the crest, which is the maximum. The crest is not equivalent to a photon; it simply indicates the peak value of the electric field. Energy in an electromagnetic wave is determined by the intensity, which is proportional to the square of the electric field's magnitude, and is calculated through integration over space and time. The concept of destructive interference is explained as the cancellation of field strengths, not the cancellation of photons. Understanding the distinction between classical field representations and quantum photons is crucial in this context.
student34
Messages
639
Reaction score
21
My textbook says that the trough of the electromagnetic wave cancels out when it meets a crest. Okay, that makes sense, but if the crest is the actual photon/wave of energy, what is this trough that can cancel out the energy? It seems to mean that there are "negative energy photons" in between each "normal" photon.
 
Science news on Phys.org
The crest in the electric/magnetic field is the electric/magnetic field vector with the largest magnitude, it's not the energy. The energy in an electromagnetic wave is proportional to the quantity
$$
\int \int |\mathbf{E}(\mathbf{r}_\perp,t)|^2 d\mathbf{r}_\perp dt
$$.
where ##\mathbf{r}_\perp## are coordinates in the transverse plane.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes student34
blue_leaf77 said:
The crest in the electric/magnetic field is the electric/magnetic field vector with the largest magnitude, it's not the energy. The energy in an electromagnetic wave is proportional to the quantity
$$
\int \int |\mathbf{E}(\mathbf{r}_\perp,t)|^2 d\mathbf{r}_\perp dt
$$.
where ##\mathbf{r}_\perp## are coordinates in the transverse plane.
I don't know the mathematical explanations of this, so I am wondering if you would you say that the crest is the photon? If so, the trough seems to being negating the photon for the moment that they meet. Is this right?
 
student34 said:
I don't know the mathematical explanations of this, so I am wondering if you would you say that the crest is the photon? If so, the trough seems to being negating the photon for the moment that they meet. Is this right?

No, the crest is not a photon. Be careful mixing classical and quantum physics like that. The crest is the maximum value of the E field in one direction and the trough is the maximum in the exact opposite (or minimum in the first). There is not a photon at the crest and an negative or anit- photon at the trough.
 
  • Like
Likes student34
student34 said:
I don't know the mathematical explanations of this, so I am wondering if you would you say that the crest is the photon? If so, the trough seems to being negating the photon for the moment that they meet. Is this right?
It follows from the definition of intensity as the energy density passing through a transverse plane per unit area per unit time. Intensity is proportional to the magnitude squared of electric field. If you want to get the energy, you then need to do the inverse operation as that to obtain the intensity, namely integrate intensity over the transverse area and then integrate with time.
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top