What is the upper envelope of the family of ballistic curves?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathmathmad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the upper envelope of a family of ballistic curves defined by the equation y = ax - [x^2(a^2+1)]/2. Participants are exploring the concept of an upper envelope as a curve that represents the maximum of a given function for fixed values of x.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss differentiating the function g(a) to find critical points and question the necessity of further computations to express the maximum as a function of x. There is also a debate about substituting the critical value back into the original equation to find F(x).

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the correct expression for F(x) after finding the maximum of g(a). Some participants are questioning the validity of their substitutions and interpretations, while others are confirming or correcting each other's statements without reaching a consensus.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating through potential misunderstandings regarding the relationship between the maximum of g(a) and the resulting function F(x). There are also informal interactions indicating familiarity among participants, which may influence the discussion dynamics.

mathmathmad
Messages
50
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


find the upper envelope for the family of ballistic curves :

y = ax - [x^2(a^2+1)]/2

an upper envelope is a curve y=F(x) such that for each x fixed, F(x) is the maximum of g(a) = ax - [x^2(a^2+1)]/2 for a in R

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


diff g(a) wrt to a and equate to 0 and get a=1/x so F(x) is 1/x?? :(
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are right to start by finding the maximum of g_x(a) = ax - \frac12 x^2 (a^2 + 1), but you need to prove that the maximum of g_x occurs at the single critical point you find.

However, you have found the value of a which maximizes g_x(a) = F(x) at that x --- not what you want, which is the value of the function at that point, expressed as a function of x. What further computation is necessary here?
 
Am I right in thinking you then have to sub the a=1/x back into the original y to get,

y=F(x)=(1/2) x^2

and mathmathmad your a warwick student right?
 
blackscorpion said:
Am I right in thinking you then have to sub the a=1/x back into the original y to get,

y=F(x)=(1/2) x^2

and mathmathmad your a warwick student right?

I do not think so as it is not related with F(x) being maximum of g(a). Btw blackscorpian, I've sent you a pm.
 
is it F(x)=1/2 - x^2/2 instead?

@blackscorpion : yes... I am. you too?
 
Yes it is
 
Ahhh crap, it is aswell.
Stupidly canceled the ones forgettin bout the over 2 part.
Well that's a mark thrown away, lol
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K