What is the value of ∞/2 in extended real numbers?

  • Thread starter Thread starter shunyadragon
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The value of ∞/2 is defined as ∞ in the context of extended real numbers. While some argue this is incorrect, they often apply conventional real number logic, which does not account for the unique properties of infinity. In extended number systems, infinity behaves differently, and halving infinity still results in infinity. The discussion emphasizes that infinity remains constant, regardless of operations performed on it. Thus, ∞/2=∞ is logically consistent within the framework of extended real numbers.
shunyadragon
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
∞/2= ∞

Please comment. I do not thnk this is right.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
What number system are you working in? Strictly speaking, in the real number system, there is no "\infty" but you can think of that as "shorthand" for \lim_{x\to\infty} x/2. In that case, yes, that limit is \infty.

And, in any number system in which \infty is defined as a number (extended reals, for example) it is true that \infty/ 2= \infty.
 
Is there any logical or math problem with the value of ∞ in this question? Does the value of ∞ change?
 
shunyadragon said:
∞/2= ∞

Please comment. I do not thnk this is right.

Why not? What would you expect a never ending number which is halved to be?
 
shunyadragon said:
Does the value of ∞ change?
No. ∞ = ∞. Why do you think ∞/2 should have a different value from ∞?

(my assumption for this post: we are working in the extended real numbers or projective real numbers)

Most likely answer: you are trying to apply your intuition about algebra of real numbers. But ∞ isn't a member of the real numbers, and so it can behave differently -- and this particular algebraic behavior is one example of that different behavior.

If you actually think about what ∞ is defined to be or what sorts of things it can quantify ∞=∞/2 should actually be rather obviously true.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top