What is the velocity of an orbiting electron in an atom?

Maalolan
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
What is the velocity of an orbiting electron in an atom? it wuld be great if anyone can explain it. Shld we calculate from the centrepetal force equation. then it wuld be classical. Any quantum mechanical explanation??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Maalolan said:
What is the velocity of an orbiting electron in an atom? it wuld be great if anyone can explain it. Shld we calculate from the centrepetal force equation. then it wuld be classical. Any quantum mechanical explanation??

You probably know that electron in atom does not have a definite position. Electron's state is described by a wave function in the position representation \psi(x,y,z). If you prepare many identical copies of the atom and measure electron's position in each copy, you'll not get the same result each time. Any value of position can be measured, and the probability of measuring position (x,y,z) will be proportional to |\psi(x,y,z)|^2.

The situation is exactly the same with velocities. The state of the electron in atom can be described also by a wavefunction in the velocity representation \psi(v_x,v_y,v_z). So, the probability of measuring velocity value (v_x,v_y,v_z) is proportional to |\psi(v_x,v_y,v_z)|^2. So, there is no definite value of velocity for the electron in atom.


There are special states (plane waves) in which measurements of velocity give certain results, but they are not among stationary states of the electron in atom.

Eugene.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top