What is the velocity profile of a truck or tractor pull?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the velocity profile of truck and tractor pulls, particularly the transition from kinetic to static friction as the sled moves down the track. As the sled's weight increases due to the load being transferred, the speed decreases until the system halts. The sled's forward movement is influenced by the weight shifting from the rear to the front, which is directly linked to its speed. The coefficient of kinetic friction remains constant until the tractor's drawbar force matches it, causing the wheels to spin and the sled to stop. Understanding this dynamic requires analyzing the sled's acceleration, plateau, and deceleration phases during the pull.
steel_cow
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Are there any fans of truck or tractor pulls out there? I am trying to understand what is happening to the coefficient of friction as the sled transitions from kinetic friction back to static friction.

It is a fairly complicated model...

The weight imposed on the front plate of the drag is increasing at a constant rate as the sled and tractor move down the track. As the load on the sled increases, and is transferred to the tractor, there is a resultant drop in speed. Eventually, the entire system comes to a hault.

What does the transition from Kinetic friction back to Static friction look like?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The weight imposed on the front plate of the drag is increasing at a constant rate as the sled and tractor move down the track.

The track that moves the weight forward from the rear of the sled to the front is on a track geared directly to the rear wheels of the sled. The weight will move forward in direct proportion to the forward speed of the sled. If the sled forward movement did not slow down as the pull prgresses, then yes that would be a constant rate forward or constant velocity forward of the weight. If the weight had a mass M, then if the sled was being pulled at constant velocity, then theoretically you could plot on a graph the normal force of the sled on the ground as a function of time or distance traveled as a straight line plot from 0 to Mg or even greater than Mg if there is some kind of overhang.

The sled does speed up and does slow down though so there is nothing about a constant rate.

You would have to know the velocity profile of the sled as the tractor is pulling it. Perhaps studying some of the videos you could get a grasp how it does paly out. I would expect there is an initial acceleration, a plateau of something similar to a constant velocity and a deceleration to a complete stop, with a lot of black exhaust smoke and dust.

Assuming the coefficient of kinetic fricion is constant, the sled would keep moving forward until the kinetic friction matches the drawbar of the tractor and the tractor wheels start spinning on the Earth and the the thing quickly comes to a halt. At that point the sled being stopped would require a larger force to move irt to overcome static friction.

Hopefully that gets you started.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top