What Is the Voltage of This Voltaic Cell at 298 K with Given Concentrations?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the voltage of a voltaic cell using the Nernst equation with specified concentrations of lead and silver ions. The standard reduction potentials for the half-reactions are provided, and the cell reaction is balanced. The reaction quotient Q is calculated as 0.32, leading to the application of the Nernst equation to find the cell voltage. The final calculated voltage is approximately 0.9446 V, and the process is confirmed to be correct after addressing a minor sign error in the calculations. The discussion emphasizes the importance of careful calculation and understanding of logarithmic properties in electrochemistry.
garbagefish
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Electrochemistry - Nernst Equation

Pb2+ + 2 e- → Pb (s) ξo = -0.13 V
Ag+ + 1 e- → Ag (s) ξo = 0.80 V

What is the voltage, at 298 K, of this voltaic cell starting with the
following non-standard concentrations:

[Pb2+] (aq) = 0.08 M
[Ag+] (aq) = 0.5 M

Homework Equations


Use the Nernst equation:

ξ = ξo - (RT/nF) ln Q

The Attempt at a Solution


there are 2 parts to this question one is to find Q and then use that to
find E.
ξo=0.80-(-0.13)=0.93V

first I balanced the equation:

2(Ag+ + 1 e- → Ag (s))
Pb(s)→ Pb2+ + 2 e-
--------------------
2Ag+ + Pb(s) --> Pb2+ + 2Ag(s)

Q = [products]^p/[reactants]^r
so Q = 0.08/0.5^2 = 0.32

i used ξ = ξo - (RT/nF) ln Q
ξ = 0.93V - ((8.314)(298K)/(2)(96500)) ln0.32 = 0.9446V

I also used E=Eo-(0.05916/n)logQ
E = 0.93V - (0.05916/2)log0.32= 0.9446

I am down to my last try and hoping if anyone can double check this for me. thanks!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
How can your answer be negative when the ln of a fraction is a negative, and subtracting a negative number from a positive number should make your answer positive?
 
o thanks i edited it, i just typed in the - sign for some reason XD, but does the process seem correct?
 
Yes.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top