What Is the Wavelength of the Second Overtone in a 2m Rope?

  • Thread starter Thread starter rwsunny85
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Harmonic Waves
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on determining the wavelength of the second overtone in a 2.00m rope under tension, where the speed of transverse waves is 48.0m/s. The initial calculation mistakenly identified the second overtone as having a wavelength of 2.00m, but it was clarified that the second overtone corresponds to the third harmonic. The relationship between harmonics and overtones is explained, noting that for string instruments, the second overtone is indeed the third harmonic. Additionally, the differences in harmonic series for various instruments, such as closed wind instruments and percussion, are highlighted, emphasizing that drums do not produce harmonic overtones suitable for creating musical chords. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for accurately solving wave-related problems in physics.
rwsunny85
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 2.00m long rope is stretched between two supports with a tension that makes the speed of transverse waves 48.0m/s .

What are the wavelength of the second overtone?

Homework Equations



L=nλ/2

The Attempt at a Solution



I got 2.00 m. Since L=2.00m and n=2 being the 2nd overtone. The site counted it wrong.

Edit: Also I did the same problem but with the 4th overtone using that equation and got it correct.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Never mind! Professor made a mistake. He meant 3rd harmonic. Way to waste 30 minutes of my life.
 
For a string the second overtone is the third harmonic
 
Really? How does that work?
 
It's just a different way to name things.

Fundamental frequency = first harmonic
First overtone = second harmonic
Second overtone = third harmonic
etc.
 
The harmonics are defined as the sequence of frequencies obtained by multiplying the fundamental frequency by whole numbers. So if the fundamental frequency is f, the harmonics are given by fn = nf and the first harmonic (n=1) coincides with the fundamental. The overtones on the other hand are defined as the sequence of frequencies above the fundamental - literally overtone means above the tone and the tonic is just another name for the fundamental (in that context).

For a string instrument, the overtones coincide with the harmonic series so we have, as AlephZero explained the identification.

Fundamental frequency = first harmonic
First overtone = second harmonic
Second overtone = third harmonic
etc.

That's also the case for open wind instruments such as a flute. But closed wind instruments (blowing off the top of a beer bottle for instance) only produce odd harmonics so we have a different identification table

Fundamental frequency = first harmonic
First overtone = third harmonic
Second overtone = fith harmonic
etc.

The overtones produced by percussion instruments are in general much more complex and in general do not coincide with the harmonic series at all.

That's why drums are - well - less harmonic in nature and are not used to create harmony (musical cords). For instance in a piano (string instrument) if you play a tonic, a major third and a fifth at the same time, you create a nice sounding chord called the major cord. That works because the 2nd overtone of the tonic coincides with the 1st overtone of the fifth and the 4th overtone of the tonic coincides with the 3rd overtone of the major third, and the 4th overtone of the fifth coincides with the 5th overtone of the major third. All these matching overtones bind the different notes into a harmonic chord. Since a drum's overtones are not harmonic, trying to play chords with drums doesn't really work. The overtones don't match and the chord wanna-be just sounds like a muddled mess. Drums are for rhythm - not harmony.
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top