I What is the weak isospin of hadrons?

Ron Paul
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
What are the weak isospins (T3 values) of various hadrons, including the proton, neutron, mesons, hyperons and other hadrons? How is the weak isospin calculated for any hadron?

Published sources provide T3 only for fundamental fermions, that is, quarks and leptons. In the fundamental bosonic sector, the photon's T3 is (0, 1), the gluon's is 0, the Higgs boson's is -1/2, the Z boson's is 0 and the charged weak bosons' is ±1. No such information appears for composite particles.

One could calculate this using Q=T3+YW/2. However, the weak hypercharge (YW) values for hadrons are also not available.

Supposedly, it is possible that the weak isospin of all hadrons is 0, since the weak interaction does not operate on the hadron as such, only on its constituent quarks. Is this the case?

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Weak isospin is not a conserved quantum number so the question has no answer.
 
Vanadium 50 said:
Weak isospin is not a conserved quantum number so the question has no answer.
Thank you.

I interpret your answer as follows: weak isospin is a quantum number that can exist only for fundamental particles. This, because composite particles (hadrons) are the result of an interaction which does not conserve weak isospin.

Hence, my assumption that "the weak interaction does not operate on the hadron as such, only on its constituent quarks" is correct.

You say that "the question has no answer"; however, is it not possible to simply say that the weak isospin of every hadron is 0?
 
Ron Paul said:
I interpret your answer as follows:

I said precisely none of that. Weak isospin is not a conserved quantum number so the question has no answer.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top