What is this antenna structure? (vertical bow tie)

  • Thread starter Thread starter berkeman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Antenna Structure
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around identifying and understanding the structure and function of a vertical bow tie antenna observed on a residential rooftop in the US. Participants explore its potential use as an over-the-air digital TV antenna, considering various models and performance claims.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant speculates that the antenna is an over-the-air digital TV antenna but is unsure about the vertical bow tie structure.
  • Another participant suggests it resembles a ClearStream 4 antenna, noting its operation with a reflector screen and additional horizontal dipole elements.
  • A different participant proposes it may be a ClearStream 2V and questions the specific advantages of the bow tie structure over horizontal elements, suggesting it may provide a wider band.
  • Some participants discuss claims made by manufacturers regarding improved VHF performance compared to traditional designs, indicating it is marketed as a UHF+VHF combo antenna.
  • One participant expresses skepticism about the actual performance benefits of the antenna, comparing it to a fishing lure designed more for aesthetics than functionality.
  • Another participant shares personal experience, stating they receive a significant number of digital channels with a different antenna design, implying that older models may still be effective.
  • A participant reflects on the marketing strategies of antenna designs over time, noting that despite changes in appearance, the underlying technology may not have significantly improved.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of opinions regarding the antenna's design and performance, with no clear consensus on its effectiveness or the validity of marketing claims. Multiple competing views remain regarding the advantages of the vertical bow tie structure and the implications of consumer antenna design.

Contextual Notes

Some claims about performance improvements are based on manufacturer assertions, and there is uncertainty about the actual benefits of the design compared to traditional antennas. The discussion reflects a variety of personal experiences and technical insights without resolving the effectiveness of the antenna in question.

berkeman
Admin
Messages
69,508
Reaction score
25,060
I saw this antenna on a residential rooftop yesterday (in the US). I'm guessing it is a over-the-air Digital TV antenna, but I don't recognize the vertical bow tie structure. The antenna is about half a meter tall. Any ideas?
 

Attachments

  • Strange Antenna Closeup.jpg
    Strange Antenna Closeup.jpg
    13.3 KB · Views: 1,048
Engineering news on Phys.org
Very odd. I'd would just have to go and ask the residents of the home.
 
dlgoff said:
Very odd. I'd would just have to go and ask the residents of the home.

LOL. I was wearing my EMT uniform at the time (about 7AM on a Sunday morning). Probably would have scared the poor residents if I'd have knocked at the door! :smile:
 
Looks like a ClearStream 4 Antenna for Free Over-The-Air Digital and HD Programming.
It is operated with the reflector screen. The horizontal dipole is something extra.
 
Baluncore said:
Looks like a ClearStream 4 Antenna for Free Over-The-Air Digital and HD Programming.
It is operated with the reflector screen. The horizontal dipole is something extra.

Thanks! At least it looks like half of the ClearStream 4...

https://all-cryptothrift1.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/DSC_0572-300x200.jpg
https://all-cryptothrift1.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/DSC_0572-300x200.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think the makers claim better performance in the VHF band than a traditional bowtie-plus-reflector design such as the DB2, enough to market it as a UHF+VHF combo antenna rather than as a UHF antenna that has some ability to receive VHF.

It came out a few years ago, around the time of the US analog-to-digital TV transition.
 
A fishing lure must be designed for two quite different functions. Firstly, most importantly to be commercial, it must catch a fisherman, then secondly, and of little importance is to catch fish.

Like a fishing lure, the thing that is really important in consumer antenna design is style and looks. It is most unlikely that the antenna performs better, but to be commercial it must look new and different.

It is probably just an old style simple antenna underneath.
Don't get distracted by their marketing hype and the unusual plastic style.
 
Baluncore said:
A fishing lure must be designed for two quite different functions. Firstly, most importantly to be commercial, it must catch a fisherman

Well it sure worked on me! :biggrin:
 
  • #10
jtbell said:
I think the makers claim better performance in the VHF band than a traditional bowtie-plus-reflector design such as the DB2, enough to market it as a UHF+VHF combo antenna rather than as a UHF antenna that has some ability to receive VHF.

It came out a few years ago, around the time of the US analog-to-digital TV transition.

Baluncore said:
A fishing lure must be designed for two quite different functions. Firstly, most importantly to be commercial, it must catch a fisherman, then secondly, and of little importance is to catch fish.

Like a fishing lure, the thing that is really important in consumer antenna design is style and looks. It is most unlikely that the antenna performs better, but to be commercial it must look new and different.

It is probably just an old style simple antenna underneath.
Don't get distracted by their marketing hype and the unusual plastic style.
I feel sorry for all the folks that trashed their old UHF-VHF "analog" antennas. I'm receiving 45 digital channels with an antenna like this.
0007900031382_500X500.jpg


from http://www.walmart.com
 
  • #11
I remember when colour TV arrived, gone was the brown cardboard box for the new antenna, the antenna came in a white box with bright red, green and blue coloured printing. Looking at the antenna, it had brightly coloured insulator blocks, no more of that UV stable black stuff. Apart from that, absolutely nothing changed.

When digital TV arrived I designed antennas optimised for each different transmit site in this corner of the state, they are manufactured locally and installed by antenna installers based on the transmit site name. The engineering can be optimised because there is no direct sale to a customer. Because I can optimise for a specific site's band, gain, beamwidth, and F/B ratio, others who buy fancy expensive antennas from a catalogue, cannot get better reception.

The internet is a sewer that flows into your office. TV is a sewer that flows into your lounge room.
Whichever way you look at it, you need a significantly better crap detector to handle the bigger pipe.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
  • #12
:smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
5K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
8K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
10K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
14K
Replies
11
Views
16K
Replies
4
Views
4K