What is track momentum in nuclear emulsion experiments?

mario25
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
In experiments with nuclear emulsion (like CHORUS,OPERA...), the emulsion is scanned for tracks left by passing particles. In track analysis, there is a quantity called track momentum.

I don't know what the track momentum is, so if anyone could help me, i would be grateful.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In nuclear emulsion tracks, the developed blobs are due to the incident charged particle "hitting" atomic electrons and leaving ionization blobs in the emulsion, not to the charged particle hitting nuclei in the emulsion. There are 3 ways that the incident particle energy or momentum can be established;

1) Multiple scattering: The small deviation of the track from the average trajectory is due to multiple Coulomb scattering of the incident particle on the nuclei in the emulsion. The mean square angular deviation of the incident particle is equal to
θ2 = (21/βp)2XRAD, where β is the relativistic Lorentz factor, p is the particle momentum in MeV/c, and X is the radiation length of the emulsion.. This can be used to estimate the momentum of the incident particle.

2) The density of blobs can be used to estimate the incident particle velocity at low kinetic energies (below about 1 m0c2). Review the Bethe-Bloch dE/dx energy loss equation.

3) Track curvature in a magnetic field.
Bob S

[added] See correct projected angle multiple scattering equation at page 13 Eqn 27.12 in
http://www-pdg.lbl.gov/2009/reviews/rpp2009-rev-passage-particles-matter.pdf
 
Last edited:
I want to thank you for your response. It will help a great deal in my understanding of particle momenta in emulsions.

But, my problem is with definition of track, not particle momenta.
Here is a excerpt from the text I was reading through:

Each found track is fitted taking into account multiple scattering in the various materials
between the hits. The track fit yields a χ2-probability P
In this calculation,
the hit resolution is assumed to be σ = 180 μm. Two effects cause the P(χ2)
distribution
to deviate from the expected uniform distribution. First, the momentum of the track can
be unknown. In this case, a momentum of 1GeV/c is assumed. Depending on the real
momentum of the particle, this can over or under estimate the multiple scattering contribution
to the hit resolution. Therefore, a cut on P(χ2)
Introduces a bias on momentum,
selecting preferably high momentum tracks. Second, the hit-residual distribution has
tails with a rms width of about 750μm. These tails are probably due to cross-talk in
the input window of the image intensifier or backscattering in the multi-channel plate.
This leads to reconstructed tracks with very low χ2-probability

If anyone is interested, full text can be found on:
https://openaccess.leidenuniv.nl/handle/1887/12079

(excerpt is from page 70)
 
The track momentum is closely related to the particle energy, kinetic energy, and rest mass:

E2 = (pc)2 + (moc2)2

For a given track, sometimes the mass of the particle is undetermined, for example differentiating between pions and muons. Multiple scattering lateral deviations and residual range (Bethe Bloch dE/dx equation) together can help identify the particle mass and the initial particle momenta (energy).

The best nuclear emulsion work was probably done by the Barkas emulsion group (Barkas Birnbaum Smith) at Berkeley. See

http://prola.aps.org/abstract/PR/v101/i2/p778_1

and the references therein. The Barkas group measurements on pions and muons determined their masses to around 0.1%, which were the reference mass values for many years.

Bob S
 
Last edited:
I now finally understand.

Thank you so much for the time and effort it took you to clarify this for me.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top