What is Upiter's speed when closest to the sun?

AI Thread Summary
Upiter, a hypothetical planet with a semi-major axis of 5.2 AU and an eccentricity of 0.2, orbits the sun. To compute Upiter's speed at perihelion, the equation v^2=GM(2/r - 1/a) is suggested, where GM is the gravitational parameter for the Sun. The discussion emphasizes converting units to AU and solar masses for easier calculations, noting that using natural units can simplify the process. The gravitational parameter μ is highlighted as a more convenient value than using G and M separately. A formula for perihelion distance is also sought to complete the calculations.
kopinator
Messages
41
Reaction score
1
A hypothetical planet Upiter orbits the sun. Upiter's semi-major axis is 5.2 AU. The mass of Upiter is .001 that of the sun. The eccentricity is 0.2. For this problem, ignore the other planets.

d. Compute Upiter's speed when it is closest to the sun.

I believe the equation I use for this is v^2=GM(2/r - 1/a), where a is the semi-major axis and r is the distance at perihelion. I know G is usually in m^3/kg/s^2 but since I'm given units in AU and solar masses, should I convert G to AU^3/Msun/s^2?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Convert everything to SI. EVERYTHING - even your age and the area of your living room! :-)
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
You could do most everything in the given units... note that GM is the gravitational parameter μ for the Sun, and it has a better known value than G or M individually.

With distance units of AU, the natural time unit TU is the sidereal Earth year divided by ##2 \pi##. That gives you a value in seconds for TU which might be useful later, but for the initial calculations just use "TU". The natural velocity unit VU is the average speed of the Earth in its orbit, or AU/TU. The gravitational parameter is then μ = AU3/TU2.

Just using AU, TU, VU in your formulas where applicable will allow a lot of things to just cancel out without dealing with a bunch of numerical values.

You still need a formula for the perihelion distance. Any ideas on that front?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top