What Is Wrong with My Approach to Solving This Electrostatics Problem?

  • Thread starter Thread starter quasar_4
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electrostatics
quasar_4
Messages
273
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



This should be simple: We have a charge density in some region of space, r< R (R is some known constant), that goes like 1/r. Everywhere else, the charge density is zero. I need to find the electric field and potential everywhere. The total charge is Q, assumed to be known.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I don't see why I can't just use Gauss's law to find E and integrate to find Phi.

For r>R, the problem is really simple: the total enclosed charge is Q, so
\vec{E(r)} = \frac{Q}{4 \pi \epsilon0 r^2} \hat{r}

potential is just \Phi = \frac{-Q}{4 \pi \epsilon0 r}

For r <R, we draw a Gaussian surface of radius r. Then Gauss's law should give

E (4 \pi r^2) = Q_{enc}/\epsilon0 = \frac{4 \pi}{\epsilon0} \int_0^r r^2 \frac{1}{r} dr = 2 \pi r^2 \rightarrow \vec{E(r)} = \frac{1}{2 \epsilon0} \hat{r}

Potential would be:

\Phi = - \int_R^r E \cdot dl = - \int_R^r \frac{1}{2 \epsilon0} dr = \frac{-(r-R)}{2 \epsilon0}

So, these don't seem correct to me at all. E has no r-dependence, and worse, the wrong units! What am I doing wrong here? Please help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The charge density inside R is proportional to 1/r, but you need to calculate the proportionality constant, which will have units of charge/area (since this constant divide by r has units of charge/volume). This will fix the units. In fact the E-field is constant in magnitude (but not in direction) inside R.
 
Thank you!
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top