Can induction prove that P(x) has a unique positive zero?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ehrenfest
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving that the polynomial P(x) = x^n - a_1 x^(n-1) - ... - a_n has a unique positive zero for positive real numbers a_1,...,a_n. The initial confusion arises from the relationship between the polynomial Q(x) and its complex zeros, leading to the concern that multiple positive zeros could exist. However, it is clarified that using induction on n can effectively demonstrate that if the proposition holds for n-1, it also holds for n due to the properties of the derivative P'(x). This approach shows that having more than one positive zero necessitates multiple positive turning points, reinforcing the uniqueness of the positive zero for P(x). The conclusion emphasizes the simplicity of proving the proposition through induction.
ehrenfest
Messages
2,001
Reaction score
1
[SOLVED] what is wrong with this

What is wrong with this.

I want to show this: Let a_1,...,a_n be positive real numbers. Prove that the polynomial
P(x) = x^n-a_1 x^{n-1}-...-a_n has a unique positive zero.


Q(x) = x^n+a_1 x^{n-1} + ...+ a_n has n complex nonzero zeroes. For each of them, we have that

0 = |x^n+a_1 x^{n-1} + ...+ a_n | \geq ||x|^n-a_1 |x|^{n-1} - ...- a_n |

which implies that |x| is a zero y^n-a_1 y^{n-1} - ...- a_n. But that implies that there could be more than one unless it is somehow true that all of the zeros of Q(x) lie on a circle in the complex plane!
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
never mind, I figured it out
 
Hi ehrenfest. I wonder if you thought of using induction on this one?

Note that if the proposition is true for n-1 then the derivative P'(x) also has one unique positive zero which in turn implies the desired property for P(n). (as it's trivial to show that for P(x) to have more than one positive zero that it must also have more than one +ive turning point).

So it's dead easy to show that the proposition for n-1 implies the proposition for n.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top