What kinds of space rays are detectable on earth

  • Thread starter Thread starter Imparcticle
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Earth Rays Space
AI Thread Summary
Various types of space rays detectable on Earth include radio waves, microwaves, infrared radiation, and visible light, while higher frequency infrared and gamma rays are blocked by the atmosphere. Neutrinos can pass through the atmosphere with minimal interaction, making them detectable. Cosmic rays primarily consist of protons and other particles, with few reaching the Earth's surface due to collisions in the atmosphere that create secondary cosmic rays. These secondary rays can be observed through air showers, although their original direction is often lost due to interactions with magnetic fields. Observatories on Earth and in orbit, like the Hubble telescope, help study these cosmic phenomena that are otherwise difficult to detect from the surface.
Imparcticle
Messages
572
Reaction score
4
What kinds of rays are emitted from various sources in space and are detectable on the surface of earth?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
If you refer to electromagnetic radiation, the answer is: the major part of radio, all microwaves, and also infrared of low frequency, and also obviously, the visible range. IR of high frequency and higher frequencies than the visible are all blocked by the atmosphere, as well as radio of very low frequency. The fact that some radio waves can reach the surface is useful, so we can have monstruous radiotelescopes like that existing in Arecibo, Puerto Rico
Neutrinos can pass freely through the atmosphere, as they practically don't interact with matter.
There are also cosmic rays. Primary cosmic rays habitually don't reach Earth's surface (though a few achieve it); practically all secondary cosmic rays reach Earth surface (secondary cosmic rays don't come from any extraterrestial source, they are created by the collission of primary cosmic rays with the atmosphere)
 
Last edited:
The Earth's atmosphere is not very astronomy friendly, albeit even astronomers prefer living on a planet that has an atmosphere. There are a number of probes and orbital 'observatories' [eg, Hubble telescope] used to scope out stuff not visible, or poorly visible from earth. There may also be other particles that we do not yet know exist because they rarely interact with ordinary matter [like neutrinos, which we knew must exist well before we actually detected them] or interact so weakly their effects are very difficult to detect [like gravity waves].
 
meteor and Chronos have given good summaries.

Just to add a few words on 'cosmic rays': these are comprised of particles (e.g. protons, Fe nuclei), EM (gammas), and neutrinos (tho' 'cosmic rays' doesn't usually include neutrinos). As meteor said, few, if any, particles reach the Earth's surface - they collide with nuclei of oxygen, nitrogen, etc (in the upper atmosphere) and generate 'air showers', which are cascades of secondary particles. These air showers are observable down here, under all the air, and there are a number of very powerful 'cosmic ray observatories' on (or under) the Earth's surface. However, as most cosmic ray particles are charged, they are affected by the galactic magnetic fields, so all information about their original direction is lost by the time we 'see' them (we can tell from which direction they were coming when they hit the atmosphere, but not where they started out).

The gammas, being neutral, aren't affected by magnetic fields. However, they don't reach the surface of the Earth either - they are detected by Cherenkov radiation, which arises because the speed of light in air is lower than that in vacuo. There also several such 'TeV gamma cosmic ray telescopes' (the 'TeV' refers to the energy of the gammas - the 'T' means 10^12, i.e. 1,000 billion).
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top