What lessons can we learn from the Charlie Hebdo shooting?

  • News
  • Thread starter DrClaude
  • Start date
In summary: If they had blown themselves up it would be more convincingly religious.In summary, the shooting at the offices of the French satirical weekly Charlie Hebdo has left 12 people dead, including the magazine's editor in chief, Charb, and two of its cartoonists. The shootings are believed to have been religiously motivated, and authorities are investigating possible links to radical right wing groups.
  • #246
naima said:
Everybody will understand that as a vegetarian you may be offended by pork and sausages.
St Paul (corinthians) told us: let your women keep silent in the assemblies.
if you are shocked by all these women in political demonstrations, use photoshop to hide them!
Or read Kol Hamevaser:
www.courrierinternational.com/article/2015/01/13/un-journal-israelien-efface-angela-merkel-de-la-photo-a-paris
No more Angela Merkel, no more women
http://www.haaretz.com/blogs/routine-emergencies/.premium-1.636823
In Polish newspaper it was also noticed that Donald Tusk was also removed from that photo. Maybe also his liberal (for American: libertarian leaning) views may lead someone into temptation? :D
 
  • Like
Likes Dotini
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #247
US Presidential advisor Valerie Jarrett calls the march in Paris a "parade".

Meanwhile, in Niger, Muslims are burning churches and killing Christians.
 
  • Like
Likes mheslep
  • #248
Vanadium 50 said:
US Presidential advisor Valerie Jarrett calls the march in Paris a "parade".
A parade that set off angry protests and demonstrations across the Muslim world.

The US would like to think it's far more astute than Europe in integrating and assimilating Muslims, and it doesn't go about it by shoving trashy free speech in their face. For example, we arrest pastors who attempt to burn the Koran.
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/nat...pastor-terry-jones-arrested-article-1.1453195
 
  • #249
Dotini said:
A parade that set off angry protests and demonstrations across the Muslim world.
You're confusing the march with publication of post massacre Charlie Hebdo issues depicting the Mohammed. It was the latter that set off more demonstrations.
 
  • #250
Vanadium 50 said:
US Presidential advisor Valerie Jarrett calls the march in Paris a "parade".

Meanwhile, in Niger, Muslims are burning churches and killing Christians.

She won't mind then if the President is introduced tonight at the SOTU as the Entertainer in Chief, the Ringmaster, etc.
 
  • #251
Lauded as hero in Paris attack, Malian man made French citizen
http://news.yahoo.com/lauded-hero-paris-attack-malian-man-made-french-092733513.html

PARIS (Reuters) - The Malian grocery worker hailed as a hero for saving hostages' lives when an Islamist militant attacked a kosher supermarket in Paris this month was made a French citizen on Tuesday.

Lassana Bathily, 24, was joined by French Interior Minister Bernard Cazeneuve and Prime Minister Manuel Valls in a packed naturalisation ceremony.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes Q_Goest and naima
  • #252
Shyan said:
Let me be specific, what do you think about Charlie Hebdo now?
Bystander said:
I agree completely. The danger in being as gratuitously reactionary as the lunatic fringe of the world's Islamic population is that the situation can be escalated to the point where that xenophobic lunatic fringe is in a position to enlist sane, civilized Moslems in a holy war against sane, civilized populations from the rest of the world who've been enlisted by their own xenophobic lunatic fringe to eradicate Islam.
I'll answer that in the Hebdo thread so we don't drag "Interview" off-topic.
I posted a couple times on page 5 (for context), and had to stop paying attention.
"People baffle me" is essentially what I think of the Hebdo "event."
 
  • #253
Bystander said:
I'll answer that in the Hebdo thread so we don't drag "Interview" off-topic.
I posted a couple times on page 5 (for context), and had to stop paying attention.
"People baffle me" is essentially what I think of the Hebdo "event."
I remember you and another member agreeing that Islam should be continually insulted otherwise it will be given a special position compared to Chrsitianality and Judaism. But why non of you considered not to insult neither? Also I should say to muslims, Jesus and Moses are sacred too.
That's what I meant when I said my post in the "interview" doesn't affect the views of people. Because you agreed with my post there but are you going to change your idea about this?
 
  • #254
Shyan said:
continually insulted
I love language barriers. I will not argue with your reading of what was written. I was agreeing with X's assertion that "special" treatment/position of Islam, Islamic tradition is NOT a solution to the problems that arise when iconoclasts like Charlie Hebdo are offensive just for the sake of being offensive to Islam. Some people are incapable of maturing beyond the behavioral level achieved by three year olds. Charlie Hebdo was one, Gary Trudeau is one, the creators of South Park, Saturday Night Live, and dozens of other examples of abuse of "freedom of speech/expression." Ignore them. Some adherents of Islam appear to be likewise incapable of maturing behaviorally beyond the skill levels of three year olds, and are incapable of ignoring "free speech," and are offended simply for the sake of being offended by the three year olds who are offensive simply for the sake of being offensive.

Infantile personalities who are dangers to themselves and others do have to be isolated. Would I throw Charlie, Gary, and other publicly offensive spoiled brats in the isolation ward as well as the crazies pulling guns? Yes. Is that the way the world works? No. I won't apologize to you for human nature --- it's not my fault that people are irrational. I will commiserate with you --- I don't like it any more than you do. I'm not a special case to demand special privileges on the basis of birthright, citizenship, religion, race, education, gender, or anything else.
 
  • #255
Bystander said:
I love language barriers. I will not argue with your reading of what was written. I was agreeing with X's assertion that "special" treatment/position of Islam, Islamic tradition is NOT a solution to the problems that arise when iconoclasts like Charlie Hebdo are offensive just for the sake of being offensive to Islam. Some people are incapable of maturing beyond the behavioral level achieved by three year olds. Charlie Hebdo was one, Gary Trudeau is one, the creators of South Park, Saturday Night Live, and dozens of other examples of abuse of "freedom of speech/expression." Ignore them. Some adherents of Islam appear to be likewise incapable of maturing behaviorally beyond the skill levels of three year olds, and are incapable of ignoring "free speech," and are offended simply for the sake of being offended by the three year olds who are offensive simply for the sake of being offensive.

Infantile personalities who are dangers to themselves and others do have to be isolated. Would I throw Charlie, Gary, and other publicly offensive spoiled brats in the isolation ward as well as the crazies pulling guns? Yes. Is that the way the world works? No. I won't apologize to you for human nature --- it's not my fault that people are irrational. I will commiserate with you --- I don't like it any more than you do. I'm not a special case to demand special privileges on the basis of birthright, citizenship, religion, race, education, gender, or anything else.

Yeah, I understand what you mean. But the problem is, non-muslims aren't judged by the actions of those kids you mentioned. But muslims are judged by actions of such fanatics. It seems to a great number of people, Islam is evil a priori and so they like to judge muslims by the action of such people. But is it correct to judge a society based on its criminals?
 
  • #256
Shyan said:
judge a society based on its criminals?
I can give you a flat "No" on that. Do I live in a country that rounded up citizens of nth generation Japanese heritage in the second world war? Yes. Can it happen again? Yes. Did a million people die in Rwanda over a totally artificial colonially imposed cultural distinction that was decades out of date or even reason to be remembered? Yes.

Is the situation going to get much worse before it improves? Thirteen centuries of bad blood to be avenged --- real or imagined atrocities, insults, suspicions, propaganda. ?
 
  • Like
Likes OmCheeto
  • #257
Bystander said:
I can give you a flat "No" on that. Do I live in a country that rounded up citizens of nth generation Japanese heritage in the second world war? Yes. Can it happen again? Yes. Did a million people die in Rwanda over a totally artificial colonially imposed cultural distinction that was decades out of date or even reason to be remembered? Yes.

Is the situation going to get much worse before it improves? Thirteen centuries of bad blood to be avenged --- real or imagined atrocities, insults, suspicions, propaganda. ?

Well, I think I'm on the border here. So I prefer no to continue. I just hope things don't get much bloody in the future, although that's not what I predict!
 
  • #258
For all people concerned about "Islamophobia on the rise".
Guess what. There is a "phobia" on the rise in Europe, but curiously, lefties seem to be deaf and blind to it.

Here's an experiment of a Swede pretending he is a Jew by wearing yarmulke. In Sweden, Malmo. Start from 28 minutes. (Enable automated English subtitles. They are not perfect, but you can understand it).



The gist of it, _merely for being a Jew_, you get harassed. Today. In Europe.
 
  • #259
"One day we will slaughter you all" says a Swede, a common, if not universal, opinion captured in the video.

The Swedes for the most part sat out WWII and managed to dodge the Third Reich until the Allies arrived, so maybe they modern inhabitants lack an understanding of what it was like to suffer, as 1939 Germany ultimately did, the loss six million of its citizens to combat and civilian deaths, the complete devastation of the infrastructure, and the partition of the country for 45 years. Six million Swedes would be 60% of the population.
 

Similar threads

  • General Discussion
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
42
Views
3K
  • General Discussion
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • General Discussion
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • General Discussion
3
Replies
73
Views
6K
  • General Discussion
3
Replies
77
Views
12K
  • General Discussion
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • General Discussion
Replies
27
Views
5K
  • General Discussion
4
Replies
124
Views
13K
Back
Top