What Limits Light-Speed in Space-Time Theory?

Crazy Tosser
Messages
182
Reaction score
0
I've been thinking about this a lot lately, and I think that the very structure of space-time puts the limit of light-speed on objets.

I think it's either:
1) In space-time, the 3-D space surface is not actually perpendicular to the time axis, but at an angle which doesn't allow objects to travel a certain distance without moving at least a certain amount in time (3*10^8 m to 1 sec)
2) In space-time, as objects are farther away, they "sink" down in time relative to you, which makes you perceive instant signals as delayed.

What do you people think?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I've been thinking about this a lot lately, and I think that the very structure of space-time puts the limit of light-speed on objets.

I suspect that's true, but I hope we are mistaken...unless the limit of light speed is a fundamental constituent of our universe and it determines the structural form of spacetime...that's what Roger Penrose concludes from his Twistor theory...
 
I think the convergence of light is the beginning of the real universe. Once we figure out how to travel at that speed, then and only then will we understand the "folding" of the universe.
 
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top