What Makes an Experiment Beautiful in Science?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ryokan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Experiments
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on identifying the most elegant biological experiments, with participants highlighting several key studies. The Avery, MacLeod, and McCarty experiment from 1944 is frequently cited as the most elegant due to its simplicity and foundational role in demonstrating that DNA is the transforming material in cells. The Hershey and Chase experiment from 1950 is also mentioned as a significant choice, showcasing the role of DNA in heredity. Other notable experiments include Hammerling's Acetabularia studies and the work of Spehmann and Mangold on organizers. Participants debate whether luck influences the elegance of an experiment, concluding that a well-executed experiment retains its elegance regardless of serendipitous factors. The conversation emphasizes the importance of these experiments in shaping our understanding of molecular biology.
ryokan
Messages
252
Reaction score
5
In Physicsweb are reported the ten most elegant experiments in Physics (http://physicsweb.org/articles/world/15/9/2).

In Biology, the Meselson-Stahl is currently seen as one of the most elegant experiments.

What biological experiment do you consider as the most beautiful? Why?
 
Last edited:
Biology news on Phys.org
I think the Avery, MacLeod, McCarthy (1944) is most elegant. Simple and anybody should read the paper.

Hershey and Chase (1950) would be my second choice.
 
I'm a fan of Hammerling's Acetabularia experiments. They're just so cool!
 
Spehmann / Mangold organizer
SCNT Briggs and Kings
ffs, the period genes and the molecular clock...brilliant
oocytes derived from bone marrow (just came out in Cell)

cant choose there's many
 
iansmith said:
I think the Avery, MacLeod, McCarthy (1944) is most elegant. Simple and anybody should read the paper.

Hershey and Chase (1950) would be my second choice.

Here's a http://dwb.unl.edu/Teacher/NSF/C10/C10Links/www.asmusa.org/mbrsrc/archive/SIGNIFICANT.htm to learn more about the Avery et al. experiment. (also see quote below)

Oswald Avery, Colin MacLeod, and Maclyn McCarty show that DNA is the transforming material in cells. They use the observations of Griffith and show the transformation of Streptococcus pneumoniae from an avirulent phenotype to a virulent phenotype is the result of the transfer of DNA from dead smooth organisms to live rough ones. They also show that the transforming principle is destroyed by pancreatic deoxyribonuclease, which hydrolyzes DNA, but is not affected by pancreatic ribonuclease or proteolytic enzymes. Macleod was Avery’s research assistant until 1941. By the time he left, he and Avery suspected that the vital substance in bacterial transformation was DNA. McCarty confirmed their hypothesis.

Oswald T. Avery Collection

Avery, O. T., C. M. Macleod, and M. McCarty. 1944. Studies on the chemical nature of the substance inducing transformation of pneumonococcal types. Induction of transformation by a deoxyribo-nucleic acid fraction isolated from pnuemococcus type III. J. Exp. Med. 79: 137-157. In Microbiology: A Centenary Perspective, edited by Wolfgang K. Joklik, ASM Press. 1999, p.116

The Hershey and Chase http://www.mun.ca/biology/scarr/4241B_Hershey_&_Chase.htm was published in 1952. The complete paper is available as pdf at the referenced site. (select blue hypertext on "blender experiment" for ref. site)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hershey and Chase were lucky in a way. Imagine that they were working with an RNA viruse rather than a DNA viruse?
 
iansmith said:
Hershey and Chase were lucky in a way. Imagine that they were working with an RNA viruse rather than a DNA viruse?
Obviously, the initial image of the genome replication would be very different.

Does luck tarnish elegance in an experiment?
 
ryokan said:
Obviously, the initial image of the genome replication would be very different.

Does luck tarnish elegance in an experiment?

I don't think so. If the experiment is well done and demonstrate the point, then it is a elegant experiment.

However, it is always fun the reflect on things that are discover due to mistakes.

As Louis Pasteur said "“Chance favours the prepared mind”.
 
Back
Top