What Minimum Speed Must an Arrow Have to Pass Through a Spinning Wheel?

AI Thread Summary
To determine the minimum speed an arrow must have to pass through a spinning wheel with eight spokes, the wheel's angular velocity was calculated as 17.593 rad/s. The distance between spokes was found to be 0.298 m, leading to a time calculation of 0.0170 seconds for the arrow to clear this space. However, an alternative approach suggested calculating the time between spokes as 0.045 seconds, yielding a required arrow speed of 6 m/s. This method highlighted the importance of understanding the relationship between angular velocity and the linear distance the arrow must travel. The discussion concluded that the problem was simpler than initially perceived, confirming the 6 m/s speed as the correct solution.
Moxin
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
A wheel has eight spokes and a radius of 38.0 cm. It is mounted on a fixed axle and is spinning at 2.80 rev/s. You want to shoot a 27.0 cm long arrow through the wheel, parallel to this axle, without hitting any of the spokes. Assume that the arrow and the spokes are very thin and evenly spaced. What minimum speed must the arrow have?

Ok.. This is how I tackled it:

First I converted 2.8 rev/s to rad/s using the equation 1 rev = 2*pi rad and got 17.593 rad/s

Then for the distance of a section of the wheel between the spokes I used the equation s = R*angle where R is the radius, so:

s = (0.38 m)((2*pi rad)/8) = 0.298 rad*m

Then I wasnt sure what I could do to get the minimum speed but I figured I'd find how long it'd take for s to "go by" using the angular velocity.. so I divided s by 17.593 and got 0.0170 seconds.. then I divided the length of the arrow (0.27 m) by 0.0170 seconds and got 15.88 m/s

Apparently that's not the answer. Anyone know what's up ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you're making this harder than it has to be. One thing I see is that you lost a unit, when you divided s by w (lowercase omega, the angular velocity) you lost the meters, where'd the meters go? s is a distance along the curve, in meters and dividing it by the angular velocity, well I'm not sure if that is an actual representation of anything, if you divide the circumference (your s*8) by the angular velcoty I believe you get the tangential velcoity.

But anyways I would approach the problem like this, you know how fast the wheel is spinning and you have to get an arrow to pass just after one spoke and just before the next so you need to know how long it takes from when one spoke passes a position to when the next spoke reaches the same position. Now the distance between spokes is 1/8 of a revolution. so take .125rev / 2.8rev/s = .045s Now an arrow is .27m long so .27m / .045s = 6m/s See if that answer is correct.
 
thanks Zimm, I knew the problem couldn't be as hard as I was makin it (mainly because it was at the beginning of the problem set I was given and those are typically easier), and yeh, your answer worked
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top