What Modern Physics Concept Is Easiest to Understand?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Loren Booda
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on which modern physics concepts are easiest to understand, with participants noting the subjective nature of comprehension. Gravity is highlighted as an easily grasped observational concept due to its everyday occurrence. The conversation also touches on the varying definitions of "modern" physics, suggesting that personal familiarity with certain concepts influences perceived simplicity. A specific example mentioned is the fusion of clean surfaces at the electron level, which one participant is currently testing in a lab. Overall, the thread emphasizes that understanding in physics is highly individual and context-dependent.
Loren Booda
Messages
3,108
Reaction score
4
In your opinion, what modern physics - theoretical or observational - is simplest to grasp?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
none :smile:
 
How do you define 'modern'? Post-Egyptian, post-Galilean, post-Newtonian...?
I think that for a layman (of which I is one), gravity might be the easiest to grasp observationally just because things fall down. You don't need the specifics to understand that it happens on a pretty regular basis.
 
It's different for everyone.
 
OK, what post-1905 physics is easiest to grasp mathematically by the layperson, yet most fundamental?
 
Well the opinion on this question would be different for a different person.

If you are studying particular recent physics concepts, then perhaps they seem easier to grasp for you.

If that is the case, then the answer for me would be the concept that if two similar surfaces are so clean that when they make contact, they can get so close to each other that the electrons overlap, then those two surfaces will fuse together.

I am currently testing this in a lab.
 
That's pure Jeanius!
 
Loren Booda said:
That's pure Jeanius!

:smile: Was that necessary?
 
Back
Top