What must the Dimensions of G be for this equation to be dimensionally correct?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Keecha
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dimensions
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the dimensions of the gravitational constant G for the escape speed equation to be dimensionally correct. It emphasizes that the escape speed is influenced by G, the mass of the Earth, and the Earth's radius, independent of the escaping object's mass. Additionally, it seeks to establish the values of a and b in the period equation T = 2*π*G^(-1/2)*M^a*r^b for dimensional correctness, where M is the mass of the Sun and r is the distance from the Sun. The participant expresses confusion about the problem's requirements and seeks guidance on understanding the equations involved. Clarity on these concepts is essential for solving the physics problems presented.
Keecha
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



"An object from the surface of the Earth with the escape speed ve can move infinitely far from the Earth. The escape speed is independent of the mass that is trying to escape and only depends on G, the gravitational constant, ME the mass of the Earth, and RE the radius of the Earth.

a.) What must be the dimensions of G be for this equation to be dimensionally correct?

b.) Given your units for G in part (a), what must the values of a and b be for the equation for T, the period of a planet around the Sun, below to be dimensionally correct?
T = 2*π*G^(-1/2)*M^a*r^b

Here M is the mass of the Sun and r the distance the planet is from the sun. The power of G is already given at -1/2.

Homework Equations



unknown

The Attempt at a Solution



None. This "class" consists of a "textbook" that contains only physics problems and no explanations as to how to do them, and "lessons" that consist only of the teacher writing problems on a white board and us having to solve them in class. I need a full lesson on how to do this, but am clueless as to where to find it, or even what to look for. I'm not even sure what the question is asking.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What's the first equation the problem is referring to?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top