What notation would mathematicians use ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter TOKAMAK
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Notation
AI Thread Summary
Mathematicians often express the identity operator using notation like \hat{1} = \int dx |x\rangle \langle x|, which represents the resolution of identity in quantum mechanics. The discussion also mentions the use of projectors in a rigged Hilbert space, denoted as \hat{1} = \int dx \ \hat{P}_{x}. A rigged Hilbert space is described as a set of four spaces, including \Omega, \mathcal{H}, \tilde{\mathcal{H}}, and \tilde{\Omega}. The conversation includes playful banter, indicating a lighthearted exchange among participants. Ultimately, the focus remains on the mathematical notation and concepts relevant to quantum mechanics.
TOKAMAK
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
How would a mathematician write this:

\hat{1} = \int dx |x\rangle \langle x| ?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
This one,i guess

\hat{1}=\int dx \ \hat{P}_{x}

,where the projector acts on a rigged Hilbert space.

Daniel.
 
What's a rigged Hilbert space dex?
 
As set of 4 spaces

\Omega\subset\mathcal{H}\cong \tilde{\mathcal{H}}\subset \tilde{\Omega}

Daniel.
 
I was just ****in with you :)
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
895
Back
Top