What physics programs should I add to my TI-84Plus?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the use of TI-84 Plus calculators in physics courses, with a focus on adding programs for various physics topics. One participant suggests that while it's permissible to add programs, they recommend against relying on calculators for introductory physics, advocating for manual calculations instead. They emphasize that complex numerical analysis should be conducted on lab workstations with custom code rather than on calculators. The overall sentiment leans towards promoting a deeper understanding of physics through manual problem-solving rather than dependence on technology. Ultimately, the conversation highlights a preference for traditional methods over calculator-based shortcuts in learning physics.
Ryantruran
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
My professor told us we are allowed to use a TI calculator and that if wanted to we could add programs to it. What programs do you thank I should add. we covered everything from one dimensional motion to basic thermodynamic stuff?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
no one?
 
I wouldn't add any program for intro physics; I would add any program just for fun.
 
You may not like my answer (I'm an academic), but you shouldn't use a calculator for more than finding the sine of an angle and the like. You should be doing everything by hand. The types of problems that you can't do by hand (complex numerical analysis), you should be doing on a lab workstation using mostly code you write yourself.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...

Similar threads

Back
Top